My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE105530
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE105530
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:58:28 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 12:28:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 44 NPDES Permit No. CO-0042161
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Twentymile Coal Company Water Quality Assessment 000042161 <br />Using the equation provided in the beginning of Section IV, the chronic low flows set out in Table <br />• A-5, the mean ammonia background concentration contained in Table A-4, and the in-stream <br />standards found in the Colorado Total Maximum Daily Load and Wasteload Allocation Guidance, <br />assimilative capacities for chronic ammonia were calculated. The data used and the resulting <br />calculations are contained in Table A-8. <br />Table A-8 <br />Chronic Assimilative Capacities for Total Ammonia (mg/1) <br />'Month Q, (cfs) Ql (cfs) Q, (cfs) M, (mg/!) M3 (mg/!) M, (mg/!) <br />January 3.1 1.2 4.3 0.031 0.7 1.4 <br />February 3.5 ] .2 4.7 0.031 0.6 1.3 <br />Mazch 4.1 1.2 5.3 0.031 0.4 1.7 <br />April 4.4 1.2 5.6 0.031 0.4 1.8 <br />May 2.5 1.2 3.7 0.031 0.3 0.86 <br />June 1.9 1.2 3.1 0.031 0.2 0.47 <br />July 1.3 1.2 2.5 0.031 0.2 0.38 <br />August 1.3 1.2 2.5 0.031 0.2 0.38 <br />September 1.3 1.2 2.5 0.031 0.2 0.38 <br />October 1.3 1.2 2.5 0.031 0.2 0.38 <br />November 1.6 1.2 2.8 0.031 0.3 0.66 <br />December 3.1 1.2 4.3 0.031 0.5 1.7 <br />. V. Antidegradation Review <br />As set out in the Colorado Regulation No. 31 contained in The Basic S[andards and Methodologies <br />of Surface Water, Section 31.8(2)(b), an antidegradation analysis is required except in cases where <br />the receiving water is designated as "Use Protected." Note that "Use Protected" waters aze waters <br />"that the Commission has determined do not warrant the special protection provided by the <br />outstanding waters designation or the antidegradation review process" as set out in Section <br />31.8(2)(b). This antidegradation section of the regulation became effective on December 20, 2000, <br />and therefore antidegradation considerations are applicable to the current Twentymile Coal Company <br />permit issuance. <br />According to the Colorado Regulation No. 33, the Upper Colorado River Basin and North Platte <br />River (Planning Region 12), Stream Segment 136 is Undesignated and thus an antidegradation <br />review must be conducted on this segment. <br />Consistent with current WQCD procedures, the baseline water quality (BWQ) for pollutants of <br />concern should be established so that the baseline can be used as part of antidegradation reviews. <br />Calculations of the BWQ for pollutants of concern, specifically total recoverable iron, dissolved <br />manganese, and ammonia are thus set forth in the paragraphs that follow. <br />BWQ is defined by the WQCD as the condition of the water quality as of September 30, 2000. <br />• Furthermore, the WQCD specifies that B WQ will include the influence of the discharger ifit was in <br />Appendix A Page 10 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.