Laserfiche WebLink
Twentymile Coal Company Water Quality Assessment 000042161 <br />Steamboat Springs) was evaluated for the 1955 through 1972 POR and a more recent POR. Based <br />• on this evaluation, the older POR data at the Yampa River was comparable to the more recent POR <br />data. Thus, the low flows calculated based on the older data from USGS gage station 09244100 are <br />considered to be representative of current low flows. <br />• <br /> <br />Table A-0 <br />Existing Quality for Site ]6 in Fish Creek <br />~~ Parameter "° <br /> <br /> <br />`' Number <br />of ; <br /> <br />Samples ~ ~ 1 Sth ' ~ <br />Percentile <br /> <br />' ~ 50th <br />Percentile ~_ ~ 85th. ~ : <br />Percentile <br />z- Mean :~=- ° Ch~~onic ~ <br />Stream.~~ <br />m.> <br />Standard ::Notes: <br />• < :_. ~.; <br />= <br />;g= <br />Sulfate (mg/1) 27 89 132 170 154 NA <br />Iron, Trec (ug/1) 30 580 1105 4600 2175 1000 <br />Cd, Trec (ug/1) 23 0 0 0 0.026 3.4 1, 2 <br />Mn, Trec (ug/1) 23 55 78 143 106 3105 2 <br />Ag, Trec (ug/1) 23 0 0 0 0 0.81 1, 2, 3 <br />Zn, Trec (ug/1) 23 3.0 20 37 23 343 1, 2 <br />Hg, Trec (ug/1) 25 ND ND ND ND 0.01 1, 3 <br />Se, Trec (ug/1) 23 0 0 0 0.22 5.0 1, 2 <br />TDS (mg/1) 30 274 420 543 402 NA <br />TSS (mg/1) 30 13 38 188 85 NA <br />NH, (mg/1) 24 0 0.015 0.070 0.031 NA 1 <br />Note I: When sample results wtte not detected, the value of zero was substituted in accordance with the WQCD's sandard approach for <br />summarization and avenging. <br />Note 2: Corrtparison of tool recoverable metals data to in-stream dissolved meals sundards were conducted because of the absrnce of a total <br />recoverable in-stream standard. <br />Note 3: For Ag and Hg, data were found at less than detection levels but the detection Itvel was greattt than the in-stream standard. Thus, in <br />accordance with WQCD's standard approach, no in-stream water qualiry assessment was performed. <br />During the months of February, April, and November, the acute low flow calculated by DFLOW <br />exceeded the chronic low flow. In accordance with WQCD procedures, the acute low flow was thus <br />set equal to the chronic low flow for these months. <br />IV. Technical Analysis <br />Appendix A Page 6 of 12 <br />