Laserfiche WebLink
• TAB 7 <br />HYDROLOGICAL DESCRIPTION <br />Regional Hydrogeology and Surface Water Chazacteristics <br />The Hayden Gulch Terminal, Inc.'s (HGT) loadout facility (LOadout) is principally situated <br />(coal storage, tipple and majority of the railroad apur)in the Dry Creek drainage basin <br />(tributary to the Yampa River) . A small portion of the railroad spur exists in the Yampa <br />River drainage basin. A regional hydrological description of this area is presented in detail <br />in Attachment 7-1. <br />Site Specific Ground Water Characteristics <br />The coal storage and tipple area of HGT'e Loadout is situated in alluvial and collwial <br />materials overlaying the Loris shale of upper Cretaceous age. Two alluvial/shallow Lewis <br />shale walls ware constructed in the loadout area prior to 1993 by the previous operator H-G <br />Coal Company. One wall, identified ae HGDALI, is located upgradient of the loadout Brea and <br />the second well, identified ae HGDAL2, is located dorngradient of the Loadout. During <br />October 1993, a new downgradient alluvial vrell, identified as HGDAL3, was constructed along <br />Dry Creek to assure all potential ground water impacts from the Loadout could be assessed. <br />The nex dotmgradiant well was installed to alleviate Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology <br />• (DM-s) concerns regarding the possibility that walls HGDALI and HGDAL2 ware pa~:ally completed <br />in the Lewis shale. The locations of the three alluvial relle are shown on Exhibit 12-2 in <br />Tab 12. Completion information for the new cell (HGDAL3) is presented in Attachment 7-2. <br />Seasonal Vaziability and Trends. Tables 7-1, 7-2, and 7-3 present the water level and <br />chemistry data for wells HGDALI, HGDAL2, and HGDAL3, respectively. Water levels ranged fr® <br />1.6 to 8.4 feet below ground surface (bgs), 0.7 to 13.5 feet bgs, and 0.9 to 7.5 feet bgs at <br />sells HGDALI, HGDAL2, and HGDAL3, respectively. On 5/4/95, the water level in well HGDALI was <br />reported as -0.42 feet, which indicates the water level in the casing was above ground <br />surface. Generally, no water level trends or seasonality are evident at the wells, however, <br />water levels tend to be higher during spring anowmalt months which indicates that snormalt may <br />ba recharging the alluvium. <br />Total dissolved solids (TDS), magnesium (Mg), sodium (Na), and sulfate (SOS) concentrations in <br />well HGDALI ors generally trice those measured in well HGDAL2. Folloring the completion of <br />wall HGDAL3 in Nov®ber 1993, the ground rater quality data demonstrates that a similar ground <br />water chemistry pattern exists between HGDALI and HGDAL3 as what existed between HGDALI and <br />HGDAL2. TDS, Mg, Na, and 90. concentrations in roll HGDALI were generally three times <br />the corresponding concentrations measured in wall HGDAL3. However, the TD9, Mg, Na, and <br />SO. concentrations in well HGDALI were generally only twice those measured in well <br />HDGAL2. TDS concentrations at wall HGDALI range from 15,000 mg/1 to 68,000 mq/1 while <br />TDS concentrations at cell HGDAL2 range from 2,000 mq/1 to 28,000 mg/1 and the TDS <br />concentrations at well HGDAL3 range from 14,000 to 19,000 mq/1. The TD9 value at HGDAL2 <br />for 08/13/90 appears to be an erroneous as the S04 concentration ie 13 times the <br />reported TDS value. <br />/Q/l/- D / <br />1 Revised 2/98 <br />