Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Section D.7.3.2 Geochemical Characteristics <br />25. Please describe the processing and rinsing methods, concentration of <br />chemicals utilized, duration, etc. of the heap material prior to water <br />quality analyses for geochemical characterization. This information <br />would be useful in determining post leaching effl uent quality limitations. <br />Section D.7.4 Heap Leach Pad Design and Construction <br />Section D.7.4.1 Pad Area <br />26. The narrative specifies that the heap pad area will be approximately <br />1500 ft, by 1500 ft. (2,250,000 square ft. or approximately 5? acres). <br />The associated table shows a total pad area of 43 acres. Please clarify. <br />27. Description of the pad stage connections explains that surface flows will <br />drain from one stage to another through spillways installed in the <br />interstage berms, and ultimately into the pregnant pond. However, the <br />Heap Plan View, (Figure C-8), and the Heap Cross Sections (Fi~lure C-9), <br />indicate that the heap will be a uniform surface, draining along the <br />center drain and perimeter berms. Please clarify. <br />28. The secondary liner is proposed to be a 12-inch thick natural soils <br />amended with bentonite to achieve a permeability rating of 1x0-6 <br />cm/sec. It is recommended that a compacted soil or clay not tie used as a <br />secondary liner as any flows reporting to the leak detection ~:ystem may <br />cause erosion of the underliner along its flow path. A geomembrane liner <br />is recommended for use as a secondary liner. Please address, <br />specifically discussing potential secondary liner damage, and proposed <br />methods of repair should failure occur. <br />29. The permit application states that the "target permeability" cf the <br />compacted soil liner is 1x10-6 cm/sec. Although we do not recommend the <br />use of a compacted soil liner, if one is employed it must achieve a <br />permeability of 1x10-6 cm/sec. It will be necessary to submit ~~ <br />documentation that this permeability has been achieved prior to placement i`- <br />of the upper liner. '~ <br />30. The primary 60-mil HDPE liner extending to the heap and pond Perimeter <br />berms, illustrated on figure C-8 and further detailed in Figures C-9 and <br />C-10, should be anchored such that the liner extends along the interior <br />surface of a "U" shaped ditch, thus providing additional anchoring <br />security. Please address. <br />31. Solutions are to be pumped to and from the mill in pressure-tested welded <br />pipe. Although the pipelines are not shown, a facility pipeline corridor <br />is noted on Exhibit C-10. <br />a. As this area can potentially come into contact with concentrated <br />cyanide solution, the pipeline corridor should be lined with HDPE. <br />A design should be submitted including the details at the haul road <br />crossing and mill building entrance location. <br />-5- <br />