Laserfiche WebLink
<br />A. How many stations of different functions were built? <br />B. What were the living conditions at the stations? <br />C. How self sufficient were the stations? Were they dominated by goods from the = `~ <br />national andantemational markets? <br />D. What was the ethnic make-up of the station keepers and crews of workers assigned to <br />different functional stations? <br />E. Were families present at the stations? <br />ReQisfration Requirements: Eiiaibility Considerations for Railroads: The following were `~ <br />adapted, in part, from the 1997 Fraser Design railroads multiple property listing. <br />Criterion a: <br />1. Is the resource a segment of one of the main lines or significant branch line of <br />importance? , <br />A. Is the resource representative of one of the above mentioned types railroads? <br />B. How much of the original line survives? Do longer or more representative <br />segments remain elsewhere? <br />G Is the resource an outstanding example of the railroads of the particular era <br />that are not preserved elsewhere in the region? <br />2. Is the property associated with an event or trend important to local or regional or national <br />history? ~' <br />Criterion b: <br />3. Is the resource associated with an individual who was important in the development or <br />use of the railroad transportation system in the locality, region or nation? <br />Criterion c: <br />4. Are the resources representative of transportation structures or landscape features, such as <br />depots, road cuts, bridges, rock retaining walls, etc.? <br />5. Is the property azchitectwally significant? Does it have engineering significance? <br />Criterion d: <br />6. Can the property provide information pertinent to addressing the reseazch questions <br />identified above? <br />7. Is the property associated with a specific ethnic group? <br />8. Does the property have interpretive values? <br />32 <br />1~ <br />