My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE104696
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE104696
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:57:51 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 11:27:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981022
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
PREDICTED LONGWALL SUBSIDENCE FOR THE SANBORN CREEK MINE ABEL 1997
From
Old Exhibit 2.05-E2 Part 4
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 2.05-E8 Part 3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Sanborn Creek Subsidence Paqe 21 September 2, 1997 <br />B. Maximum individual panel tensile (+E) and compressive (-E) <br />strains were calculated by multiplying Ste./depth for each profile <br />• line by the multipliers taken from the prediction graph included in <br />Appendix B. <br />The subsidence contours plotted on Plate la for panel #1 and <br />on Plate 2a for Panel #2 were predicted from the subsidence profile <br />graph, Figure 5. Figure 6 provides the predicted worst-case <br />horizontal strain profile graph used to locate the maximum strain <br />contours on Plate lb for Panel #1 and for Plate 2b for Panel #2 as <br />a single separate panel. Panel #2 is the first panel to be <br />longwall panel mined in the first group of three panels. <br />The vertical subsidence and horizontal strain profile graphs <br />were modified for a 25° angle of draw. It was necessary to make <br />this modification from the NCB subsidence and horizontal strain <br />profile graphs for the NCB 35° angle of draw measured in Great <br />Britain. Appendix B contains the NCB 35 angle of draw profile <br />prediction graphs. Angles of draw measured adjacent to western <br />U.S. coal mines (Pendleton, 1985; Gentry and Abel, 1978; Abel and <br />Lee, 1984) are consistently smaller than the 35° NCB angle of draw. <br />Subsidence contour depths were located along each panel <br />_ ribside and profiles constructed using Figure 5. The following <br />example for the 6-ft subsidence contour at the center of the <br />starter room of 560-ft wide Panel #1, Plate la, demonstrates the <br />calculations at a depth of 500-ft, as follows: <br />1) Six (8.86-f t, the second line on Table 9) along the subsidence <br />profile occurs at the center of the panel, equidistant from the <br />sides and end of the 560-ft wide Panel #1, i.e. 280-ft inside <br />Panel #1 <br />2) The 6-ft partial subsidence depth represents 0.68 of Ste. <br />3) Following the 1.12 panel width/depth ratio (Table 4) of 1.12 <br />profile line from the Y-axis to 0.685„ interpolated between <br />the 0.6S~x and 0.7S~x lines on Figure 5 the distance from the <br />panel center to the 6-ft subsidence contour is at 0.92 times <br />the 500-ft depth on the X-axis from the center of the panel <br />l (210-ft), or approximately 70-ft inside the panel from the <br />Ii starter room chain pillars. <br />`J Locations for all the predicted subsidence contour values were <br />calculated and the predicted subsidence contours plotted on Plate <br />la. This process was repeated for Panel #2, Plate 2a to <br />L demonstrate the difference between the predicted subsidence for the <br />individual Panel #2 and the predicted subsidence for the initial <br />group of panels; Panel #2 plus Panel #3 and Panel #4. Predicted <br />maximum subsidence over Panel #2 when it is mined and before Panel <br />#3 is mined is 3.90-ft (Table 9). The predicted worst-case <br />. subsidence over Panel #2 following mining of Panel #3 and Panel #4 <br />~ 21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.