Laserfiche WebLink
State Reg. <br />C. INTERPRETATION. To meet the Federal requirements listed in the , <br />introductory paragraph, the flow chart must be interpreted in accordance <br />with what is required. This is done as follows: <br />Drainage Control. Drainage control is designed in boxed allocated for <br />diversions and culverts, impervious areas, and interception via grasses <br />and depressions. These boxes are cross-referenced in the circles to <br />location maps, cross-sections, and design criteria for roads, parking tots, <br />diversions, culverts, and grading procedures. These plans meet the <br />requirements for a plan for drainage control. <br />Treatment of Drainage. The treatment of drainage requirement is met <br />near the end of the flow in the box designated for sedimentation ponds <br />and buffer zones. Again, in the circle is across-reference to the appro- <br />priate section of the permit which gives specifics of the plan for design <br />of the ponds and buffer zones. <br />Restoration of Recharge Capacity. Recharge capacity of the mine is , <br />currently being studied at the Seneca II Mine. Piezometers have been <br />placed in reclaimed material to determine if an aquifer is being estab- <br />lished in the regraded spoil. The circles denote where in the permit the <br />grading plan may be found which goes into detail on how we plan to meet <br />this requirement. <br />Monitoring Program. Seneca Coals, Ltd: s monitoring plan and its proce- <br />dures are described in Tab 7. Again, on the flow chart, monitoring points <br />are denoted by triangles. <br />Prediction of the Hydrologic Impacts of the Mine. The total hydrologic <br />system as one component is combined with the premining basin charac- <br />teristics. A prediction of the final impact of the mine can be made from <br />this one component. Again, this iscross-referenced in the circle. <br />I <br />1 <br />14-14 <br />Revised 5-27-81 <br />