Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />-54- • <br />of the permit?, Or is that, you're making it....I'm just <br />confused as far as what you're attempting to make. <br />Turner: A condition to the permit. <br />Dr. Ward: As I understand it, a condition to the permit. <br />Rindahl: <br />Ward: <br />Rindahl: <br />Pring: <br />Rindahl: <br />Lynn: <br />Rindahl: <br />Ward: <br />It's interesting 'cause you're making a condition to the permit <br />that a known situation is in violation of the law. <br />Well, it doesn't state that there are any. It just says that <br />there if there are such they be drawn into compliance. <br />You want to hear your motion? <br />It says all permits, is what he said. <br />We have permits that we're reviewing right now so we know that <br />we have permits to be brought in law. <br />Applications. <br />Applications, I'm sorry, yeah. I certainly respect Bob Turner's <br />motion, but I do think that you're stepping a little bit <br />farther on thin ice. We do have their applications, we are pro- <br />cessing them, we do have them scheduled for the January meeting, <br />if you could take our effort to cover. what Bob's trying to cover, <br />I think you probably would be better off without the motion. <br />You're getting your fist a little farther in the cookie jar. <br />I didn't quite follow that. I think it says that all applications <br />in effect be completed and that legal permits based on all <br />applications, it doesn't say operations. <br />Rindahl: Do you want to hear it again? <br />