Laserfiche WebLink
• -45- • <br />done, but I also want to see us proceed with the business of <br />the state, and supposing that at this time, whether it's this <br />see-no-evil, speak-no-evil or whatever approach that you <br />may make on this or that we might make on it, that we issue <br />this permit today because we haven't yet found that they are <br />actually in violation on any other permit, which seems to me <br />that we are at this point. That this is what we have got to <br />make a determination on, are they in violation or not? And we <br />find that, and we, if I might put it this way, we ignore the <br />situation or we find at least that they are not in violation, <br />and that we are among ourselves in a way saying, all right, <br />we'll give you 90 days to bring these other operations into <br />permit, but we'll issue this permit today, so that you may <br />proceed with the operation to get this job done in Durango. <br />In 90 days we review this situation and we find that they are <br />not permitted on the others, is there anything to keep us at <br />that time from saying, you're in violation on your other opera- <br />tions and you will cease and desist on this operation as well as <br />the others? <br />Lynn: The only way I would say that legally you could do that would be <br />if you conditioned this permit upon them having the other opera- <br />tions permitted by you by that amount of time. Otherwise, if I <br />were their attorney, I would argue that you knew about the other <br />operations when you issued me this one; the appropriate thing <br />for you to have done was not to have issued this one in the first <br />place, and how can you stop me on this one now when you issued <br />