My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE104313
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE104313
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:57:35 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 11:02:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1976027
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/18/1976
Section_Exhibit Name
TRANSCRIPT OF NOVEMBER 18 1976 MEETING OF COLORADO MINED LAND RECLAMATION BOARD
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />-24- • <br />up if they come in with everything at once. I just need to <br />call to your attention the fact that the words you were reading <br />into the statute... <br />gown: Okay. Currently found to be in violation. <br />Obernyer: And the Board makes a finding. <br />Itindahl: This is an impossible situation for the staff. No way that this <br />could be done. <br />~~bernyer: Legally, the only authority that.can make the finding is this <br />Board and not my office, nor the staff. <br />Rindahl: I understand. That's correct. But what I'm saying is (mumble)... <br />Ward: Really, 2 think I understand what you're saying--it's impossible <br />to deal with 12 operations simultaneously. It (is) virtually <br />impossible for the board to approve those and one, in effect, <br />operation, and that the alternative to that is to have before us <br />permit applications for all of the mining operations and assumed <br />that those can be worked out. <br />Itindahl: .This is the situation that Harris Sherman was discussing at the <br />last meeting, that unfortunately the legislature did not provide <br />a method for doing this. The reason probably was that they were <br />all required to be permitted under the old act, the '73 Act, <br />but there is still a problem, but....we have a very difficult <br />situation. Lynn, you might want to comment on the Peabody <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.