PERMFILE104241 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

<)btccuon k~ Jule Ilennnp Pcrnut Application !~o. \1-.'.Op;.o±tU 1'a4e 3 of v Use or evaporttiun of ++ntcr exposed dunng mining operations will consume native water supplies tributary to the South Platte River and injure existing water rights.:\ppltcant has nut Gated that any water is exposed as a conseyucnce oC mimng will oat be used tia minim operations. or stored. without a substitute water supply plan appn+ved by the Division of \\'uter Resources. Rule 3.G.L(a). Therefore, the application a incomplete. h. Rule ei.4.13 requires the Opcrahn• :\ppltc:rat ro provuie the source of the Opcrator.Applic;uu's Icgul right to enter and intli;ne a mining operation im tltc at~tccted land. As evidenced below.:\pplicant dues not has c the legal nght to enter and initiate a mining operniun. Therofi+rc. the apphcution is incomplete. ?. On Junc 1, ?flhfi. in nspcrosc to Ohjccdors' \1:q _'~. _'U11(+ \1otiun.:lpplieant suhmittc;d a +tritten re_ttur+t, signed by iU representative, Angela 13cll:utu,ni, to the L)\1(;, tivtthdrawing rts rcilucst ti+r a J une'.'_I)ne,pre-hearing conf'erenec and asking tier an extension of the application mview period omit ,\ugust ?O. ?l)Oh. :, fiv Order of the Board uf.lune 7. ?(Itth, the Guard Chan ruled that Ohjectc+rs' May ~j, ?(IU(+ Motion eras maul because rlpplicam u~ttlxlretr its rcYlucst ti+r a .tune 2.'_UUb pre-hearing cunf~rrnre and agrecil to extend the applic:rtiun review pent+d to .August 3U, ?fJ(IG. y. The permit application remains ineumpleto. 'lhereturc, the Board hearing should he continued wail August. 2U(Iri, or, m the altcrnutivc, denied, fir the ti~llowing roasous: a. Rule 1.?l l) states that: "... all applications. public noncex. inspccnun rcpons. documents. maps. exhibits. currespondcncc, tests, analyses, records of action or tindings tit the Bo:u•d or Oltice and other inti+mration ...shall he promptly made available fur inspection to any menthrr of the public at the utiices o(the Ot tics ..."Over several a ceks, Uhicctors and OhluA+rn' cowtscl have made several attempts m obtain a cumpicle life nl'ihe permit application in this matter (rum the DM(; Ohiectors and their counsel obtained ('Ds of many D\1C; document images tar Permit file \u. \9-?UU~-utiO, but later Icamcd that certain documents, such as ailuyuacy rcvien's and adequacy rcvtcw response. ~~ ct'c not n+cludcd in those ('Ds. Just t'cciauly, Uhjccan's' counsel. Shecla Stack learned that the Ut'tice of'the State 1inglnl'CI'suhmitted comments in i~ehruar~. ?rniG to Ihts upphc;tuun, hw said comments were nut included in any ('D provided ro the Uhiectors by the Division. OhjerNrs and their counsel h:nr nu ic'ay al knowing if they have been provided. and believe they have nut been pn+vidcxl, with all documents in the D~iG tilt tier Penntt No. M-_'OU~- It\tl.