My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE103876
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE103876
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:57:17 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 10:33:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT 10 VEGETATION INFORMATION
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
34 <br />gallon of runoff water was much higher for the summer storm period than <br />for spring runoff. <br />The amount of total vegetative cover (Table 11) and the percent- <br />ages of both seeded and volunteer cover species have a marked affect <br />on the quantity of runoff and sediment yield for the summer storm <br />period. The treatment seeded ~.vith just shrubs and without any manage- <br />ment treatment had sediment yields that were considerably higher than <br />any other treatment; this treatment has the lowest total vegetative <br />cover and most of this cover is made up of volunteer cover species. <br />Sediment yields for the shrubs only treatment are even greater on the <br />4:1 slope. Treatments where the seeded species cover values are highest <br />have the lowest runoff and sediment yields; these treatments include <br />seeding shrubs, grasses, and forbs with the additional management <br />practice of mulching or mulching and fertilizing. Increasing the <br />slope to 4:1 did not greatly increase sediment yield for the mulched <br />and fertilized treatment. <br />The most important concept that can be gained from the runoff <br />and sediment yield data is the magnitude of the values. As was <br />mentioned earlier, the storms contributing to the June 24 sediment <br />values were relatively small and of a low intensity; one must consider <br />that an intense summer thunderstorm would result in much higher values. <br />A few of the collection culverts did leak when checked on <br />August 31, 1976; thus, maximum runoff values for spring runoff on <br />the plots with leaking culverts are not accurate. This leaking did <br />not affect sediment values, however, because the sediment is caught <br />in the primary collector (plastic garbage can) in each culvert. <br />Runoff values for the summer storm period were not affected by the <br />leaking because runoff did not exceed the volume of the primary <br />collector. The culverts were resealed in October 1976. <br />Vegetation <br />Shrub counts of bitterbrush are highest in the treatment that <br />was seeded with just shrubs on both the 11 ft. x 73 ft. runoff plots <br />(Table 11) and the 11 ft. x 22 ft. plots (Table 12). Bitterbrush <br />may also be responding to the mulch treatments (Table 11). Mulching <br />seems to be enhancing serviceberry establishment on the 11 ft. x 73 ft. <br />plots, however, this trend is not apparent on the mulched and ferti- <br />lized treatments of the 11 ft. x 22 ft. 4:1 slope plots by the end <br />of June and this may account for the lack of serviceberry seedlings <br />on these plots. <br />Big sage establishment was also enhanced by mulching; the <br />extremely high value (Table 11) for big sage on the mulched treatment <br />seeded with shrubs, grasses, and forbs is due to wind dispersal of <br />sage seed from nearby native stands. Observations on the revegetation <br />test plot in January and February of 1976 indicated that the prevailing <br />winds had been out of the southwest and snow drifts had accumulated <br />on the runoff plot with this very high sage seedling density. Big sage <br />• <br /> <br /> <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.