Laserfiche WebLink
3 <br />the seeded species; however, the snow accumulation may also cause <br />• some runoff problems. Cover data was collected on volunteer species <br />on all studies in ±he revegetation test plot in 1976; cover data in <br />future years will lend insight into the ecology of these volunteer <br />species. The elimination of the volunteer species on the one <br />replication of the individual species seedings will act as a control <br />in determining the competitive importance of the volunteer species. <br />Lambsquarter and mustard do not appear to have any severe <br />- negative effects with respect to reclamation; however, this may <br />not be the case with a "weed" such as Canadian thistle. Canadian <br />thistle is also a common weed in the mountain shrub vegetation <br />type, and in contrast to lambsquarter and mustard which are annuals, <br />Canadian thistle is a perennial; thus, it is very difficult to <br />control once it is established. <br />_ Big sage had very high seedling densities in some areas of <br />the revegetation test plot in spite of the fact that it was not <br />seeded in any areas of the test plot except fior the individual <br />species seedings. Big sage seed is wind dispersed and apparently <br />1975 must have been a good seed year. Control and possibly <br />eradication of these volunteer sage seedlings may be necessary in <br />future years because it would not be desirable for studies on the <br />test plot to become dominated by big sage. Daubenmire (1975)1 <br />states that the dispersal distance of big sage seed is 33 m; <br />seedlings on the test plot may indicate that big sage dispersal <br />distances may be as high as 50 m. In either case, we would <br />recommend that to alleviate high densities of volunteer big sage <br />• seedlings on a reclaimed site the big sage be removed for a <br />distance of a± least 50 m around the site; however, we are not <br />recommeding total elimination of big sage from reclamation usage. <br />The following sections of this report discuss each study in <br />the revegetation test plot. Each section consists of an introduction; <br />an explanation of treatments, seed mixes used, seeding methods and <br />dates, and evaluation dates; and a results section containing a table <br />of surrniarized data and a discussion of the major points. A plot <br />diagram with the treatments labeled accompanies each section of this <br />report (figures 2-14); Figure 1 shows the general revegetation test <br />plot design. <br />Vegetation analysis and runoff sampling methods are described <br />in the appendix (pages 65-66) and precipitation data is recorded on <br />Appendix Table 1. Precipitation data from the Meeker weather station <br />which is 24 miles from the revegetation test plot indicates that the <br />winter of 1975 and 1976 and the summer of 1976 were dryer than normal. <br />This report supersedes the 1975 report. Several corrections in <br />the text, tables, and figures have been made since the 1975 report. <br />All of the unsummarized cover data and the shrub count data are in <br />Appendix Tables 1-19. <br />Daubenmire, R. 1975. Ecology of Artemisia tridentata subsp. <br />tridentata in-the state of lJashington. Northwest Sci. 49:24-35. <br /> <br />