Laserfiche WebLink
TO <br />~IU WAY MtSSA~L~ <br />Will James • FROM• <br />SUBJECT: E1 Paso County <br />M <br />E <br />S <br />S <br />A <br />G <br />E <br />R <br />E <br />P <br />L <br />Y <br />DATE 11/10 <br />I got a call yesterday (Thursday, 11/9) from Charles Ferry, E1 Paeo county <br />ktorney. They have received our iattaxxdY recent letter, telling them that they mush. <br />g a o s e c, you a e e er, I signed it . <br />Their res onse is to res C mnly hornuaa +ha~ ~}ieYe_t~~ m <br />3 is in effect, atd that it negates, or at least ~ reduces their obligations under <br />the act. I said,in respons@, that they should send us a letter clearly stating <br />-their-positonbm th' esenteg-~~Fie-hoaz ~ior boar <br />action. Berry and I agreedthat a cwt ^E test Qf~•TR ~ ;B_i¢~h <br />a ire-need ro--caiir-about-this;-or-shall-we~ust-b~i~to- puT~fie-w5ee s 3n <br />motion for a court test? I rant to make certain as f <br />issues as to :iJR 3 are presented cleanly, and that the u~pc litigation not get <br />en ng in side issues of notice, time requir ments, etc. <br />SIGNED <br /> <br />n <br /> <br /> <br />- -- <br />' <br />J <br />DATE: <br />SIGNED <br />~' ~r.~ <br />~ l~~ ~~- <br />~_ . <br />LASCAOEe ~,.Cj]]S ~NI NTED IN U.S.A. I <br />