My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE103693
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE103693
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:57:10 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 10:19:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1987171
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/20/1995
Doc Name
DISTURBANCE DEFINITION & BOND AMOUNT FOUNTAIN COLONY PIT FN M-87-171
From
MARK A HEIFNER
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mark A. Heifner, Plant Ecolog• • Vegetation ecology III I II I II I II IIII III <br />37 East Colorado Avenue Land reclamation planning <br />Denver, CO 80210 Visual impact analysis <br />(303) 722-9067 (Voice and Fax) Documentary photography <br />January 20, 1995 <br />Jim Dillie ;~ECEIVFD <br />Division of Minerals and Geology tIAN 20 ~gg5 <br />Rm 215 Centennial Bldg. <br />1313 Sherman St. <br />Denver, CO 80203 Division of Minerals & Geology <br />RE: Disturbance definition and bond amount. Fountain Colony Pit. <br />File !1 M-87-171 <br />Dear Mr. Dillie: <br />I discussed with Mr. Von Engeln the matter of attaching the bond to some kind disturbance on <br />the site. In light of this need and the nature of the immediate future of this site, Mr. Von <br />Engeln desires to commit [o a maximum of 1 acre of disturbance in the form of minor <br />excavations, probably with a backhoe. This disturbance area limit includes associated access <br />disturbances, if any. However, it is not expected that access would require any road <br />construction or other types of disturbance beyond what would occur by simply driving over the <br />existing vegetation. That type of disturbance would probably not require any reclamation. <br />This amount seems consistent with the purpose of the reaffirmation action that has been <br />requested. It will allow a sufficient amount of disturbance so anyone who is interested in the <br />site and desires to confirm for themselves the nature and extent of the deposit to do so. It is <br />further understood that any amount of disturbance required beyond this 1 acre total would <br />require an increase in the bond. <br />If you have any questions, please call. <br />Respectfully, <br />%/~ ~j~i~af~ <br />Mark A. Heifner <br />cc: R.D. Von Engeln <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.