My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE103602
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE103602
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:57:06 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 10:15:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
8/28/2007
Section_Exhibit Name
2.05 Operation and Reclamation Plans Part 2
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
their survival characteristics under adverse conditions. These same reports document that the introduced species <br />are capable of providing a permanent vegetation cover, have a longer life span and are more proli&c than some of <br />• the slower developing native species. <br />The proposed introduced species are currently encountered in Routt County. All are deemed desirable from a range <br />seeding and wildlife management standpoint. Their nutritional value for the compatibility with livestock and <br />wildlife aze well documented. Mule deer preferences for intermediate wheatgrass, desert wheatgrass, orehazdgrass, <br />timothy, brome Bass, alfalfa, and milkvetch are documented by Kufeld et al, (1973). Elk preferences are reported <br />by Kufeld (1973) to include desert wheatgrass, timothy, brome, alfalfa, milkvetch and small borne[. Plummer et al. <br />(1968) reports that studies in Utah have shown big game prefer alfalfa, small borne[, desert wheatgrass, <br />intermediate wheatgrass, pubescent wheatgrass, smooth brome, and orchardgrass. <br />Introduced forbs are restricted to legumes which are noted for their soil building properties as well as a high protein <br />sowce for grazing animals. A major wildlife concern in the Twentymile Park area is sage grouse habitat. Legumes <br />are the only recommended plant species specified in all reseedings to improve sage grouse habitat (Western States <br />Sage Grouse Committee 1967). Pyrah (1969) found that sage grouse moved out of the sagebrush and into "alfalfa <br />fields as the forbs in the sagebrush desiccated". Gill (1966) reported that legumes represented 51% of the sage <br />grouse diet during the summer months. Alfalfa, cicer milkvetch, and small bumet represent a desirable feed sowce <br />for sage grouse. <br />Livestock forage preference for the proposed introduced species has been documented by Marquiss et al. (1974). <br />Palatability ratings in order of descending preferences were: smooth brome, intermediate wheatgrass, pubescent <br />wheatgrass, desert wheatgrass, western wheatgrass, and beardless wheatgass. )n a study spanning almost 30 years <br />in which some ]27 species of gasses were planted, Gomm (1969) documented livestock preferences for the <br />introduced species proposed in the pastweland seed mixtwe. He concluded his studies with the following <br />statement: "Generally, the inroduced species have been more palatable than the native in areas where range <br />seeding is a common practice." <br />The nutritional value of the proposed introduced species is predictable and is largely independent of geochemical <br />changes resulting from disruption of the topsoil and overbwden. Cook and Harris (1950) state that: <br />"environmental factors and soil moistwe are more important in determining the nutrient content of range forage <br />plants under various site conditions than the chemical content of the soil...." Reclaimed vegetation quality, as <br />reported by DePuit et al. (1976), was found to differ, but not significantly from that occumng on undistwbed sites. <br />The Director of Extension Services in Routt County, Colorado, confirms that, according to the present State and <br />Federal noxious plant lists, the proposed introduced species have clearance for seeding, and are not considered <br />poisonous or noxious. <br />Seeding and planting of the disturbed areas will be initiated during the first favorable planting conditions afrer final <br />seedbed preparation, as specified in Rule 4.15.3, Seeding and Planting. In general, reclamation areas be prepared <br />for seeding by ripping the surface to break-up and roughen the soil material. Ripping will provide a rough surface <br />to hold the seed, promote moisiwe and root penetration, and minimize surface runoff until the vegetation becomes <br />established. Distwbed areas will be drill or broadcast seeded following necessary surface preparation. Generally, <br />drill seeding will be utilized for most regraded areas unless ground conditions, topography, or the limited size of <br />certain areas preclude safe and cost effective use of this seeding method. A conventional rangeland drill with disks <br />and packer wheels will be used, with seeding at the rates specified in the seed mixtwes. All other disturbance areas <br />will be broadcast seeded using equipment-mounted or hand broadcast seeders. Seed will be broadcast at the <br />increased rates specified in the seed mixtwes and seeded areas will be harrowed, raked, or dragged to bed and cover <br />the seed. Any areas where conventional seeding (drill or broadcast) is not practical due to slope gradients and <br />related equipment safety concerns (>3H:1 V) will either be hydro-seeded and hydro-mulched or broadcast seeded <br />and protected by erosion control blankets or similar materials. Seeding will normally occw in late-fall to allow the <br />• seed to "winter-over"' so that it germinates in the spring when soil and moistwe conditions are optimal for effective <br />germination and initial establishment. <br />'1R06-52 2.05-112 02/17/06 i <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.