My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE103529
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE103529
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:57:03 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 10:10:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2005066
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
10/13/2005
Doc Name
Reclamation Permit Application Form
From
Asphalt Paving Company
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. 1etTKeller <br />May 3, 2005 <br />Page 2 <br />of the model remains the entire width of the alluvial aquifer north and south of Wattenberg, being <br />approximately 2 miles wide on average. The input data for the model, including alluvial aquifer <br />characteristics such as water table depth, saturated thickness, and transrnissivity, were derived from <br />USGS maps and reports for the South Platte River basin, from water table information from Asphalt <br />Paving, and from site specific boring logs conducted by Ground Engineering Consultants of <br />Englewood, Colorado. We increased the number of cells within the model from 2604 to 5921 cells, <br />in a configuration of 70 columns by 101 rows, in order to increase the sensitivity of the simulations <br />azound these new pit areas. The model grid is variable in size, with cell dimensions ranging from a <br />maximum of approximately 820 feet in the areas outside the general town area to a minimum of <br />approximately 63 feet in the areas of the pits where greatest definition is required. Figure 2 presents <br />the final active model grid, while Figure 3 presents the grid on the USGS topographic background <br />that was used as a base map. <br />Our next step in developing the model was to run a steady state simulation without the pits <br />or the Town of Wattenberg's well in place in order to calibrate the modeled starting heads such that <br />they accurately represent the water table elevation across the model. We modified water table <br />elevation data from USGS maps and our prior Wattenberg model to reflect current conditions in the <br />pit azea as determined from actual data obtained from the recent borehole data obtained at the pit <br />sites. We compared the resultant head configurations to the mapped water table contours by USGS <br />and noted good general agreement, indicating that these heads were thereby suitable for executing <br />the pit simulations. These head values then became the initial heads for the subsequent predictive <br />model runs. The calibration head contours aze presented in Figure 4. <br />Our first set of simulations incorporated the Wattenberg municipal supply well into the <br />model. We initially simulated pumping of the well at a rate of 75 gallons per minute ("gpm") for a <br />continuous period of 365 days. Very little drawdown was noted in the vicinity of the well under <br />this pumping scenario and it was at first thought that there might be a problem with the model. <br />Further research into other wells producing from the aquifer in the Wattenberg vicinity revealed that <br />wells pumping as much as 1,500 gpm exist nearby. This gave us comfort that a 7S gpm well would <br />be expected to induce very little drawdown and that the model was operating properly. We next ran <br />simulations incorporating the intermittent pumping that we understand reflects how the well is <br />normally operated. Under these scenarios, even less drawdown was indicated at the well but this <br />observation comports nicely with reports from representatives of the Wattenberg Improvement <br />Association that the well, when in operation, draws down only a few feet and then goes into <br />essentially a steady state condition with no further drawdown. The scenarios run simulated <br />pumping cycles of 10, 12, and 16 hours per day. The drawdowns induced by these various <br />pumping cycle scenarios were essentially identical, again matching the reported response of the <br />aquifer to the actual well pumping. Since completing the modeling work, we were informed that <br />the system may actually be pumping at only 45 gpm; we will be confirming this in the neaz future. <br />A lower pumping rate for the well would be a positive factor in that even lower predicted <br />drawdowns would be observed thus reducing the susceptibility of the well to changes in local water <br />table caused by the presence of the lined pits. <br />The slurry walls were then incorporated into the model, both with and without the <br />Wattenborg well pumping. Figure 5 presents the model grid and basemap with the slurry walls <br />Martin and Wootl Water Consultants, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.