Laserfiche WebLink
s <br />Ms. Christina L. Kamnikar <br />February 21, 2000 <br />Page 4 oj4 <br />Item #13 -The proposed setbacks outlined in Tom Schreiner's adequacy review (December 16) <br />ire acceptable. The stability report simply shows that the minimum setback allowed from a slope <br />stability standpoint is 100.0'.\\If't,he hydraulic and hydrologic conditions warrant a greater setback <br />then those setbacks will govern.~i I„ ~ ~o~ ~,,;, <br />Item #14,15 -The typical cross-section as well as soil testing criteria aze shown on exhibit F. <br />,Il~c , rr~ , , <br />~~ <br />~ ~ ~' d° f you have any questions please feel free to call. <br />l <br />~~.1 '~~Cordially, <br />TUTTLEAPPLEGATE, INC <br />Mike Applegate, PE anon Murr , EIT <br />cc: TA File #99-182 <br />Mr. Mike Reefer, Camas <br />Objection List <br />