My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE102773
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE102773
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:56:32 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 9:14:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999098
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/23/2000
Doc Name
ADEQUACY REVIEW RIVERVIEW RESOURCE M-99-098
From
TUTTLE APPLEGATE INC
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• ~ • <br />_._ <br />__ <br />~- <br />iii -i iii iiiii iiiiiii <br />999 <br />7tittleApplegate,lnc. <br />Consultants for Land, Mineral and Water <br />~~ b- <br />~,o ~ <br />~~~ .. <br />"~~ <br />February 22, 2000 <br />Ms. Christina L. Kamnikaz <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />,~=CEIVED <br /><~ <br />Subject: Adequacy Review - I2iver~ie+v Resources - .#M -99-098 <br />Dear Christina: <br />G ~ g 2 3 2000 <br />~.,~,,:~ „i nAinerab & Ge01o9Y <br />In answer to your letter dated January 20, 2000, We have prepazed the following response: <br />Item #1 -The presence of de-watering trenches aze included in the stability model. The height of <br />the mined slope is approximately five feet higher than the bore logs indicate the gravel reserve to <br />be. This is done to account for any de-watering trench that may be necessary. The phreatic surface <br />shown starts at the toe of the slope and transitions back to the normal ground water surface <br />elevation as shown in the attached borelogs. This represents a highly conservative estimate of the <br />phreatic surface found next to a mined gravel highwall with a de-watering trench located at the toe <br />of the slope. <br />C <br />~.~' Item #2 -You have requested that the bedrock andemeath the gravel reserves be modeled with a <br />,.)` '~ cohesive value of 0. We do not believe this to be a valid assessment of the strength of this material. <br />~~ ~ The zero cohesive strength is referring to the residual strength of a clay material. This type of <br />analysis is not appropriate in this case for several reasons: <br />1. Gravel high walls aze considered to be temporary structures. It can take several years for the <br />clay material to reach its "residual strength" if at all. <br />2. The weathered claystone under the gravel reserve will not be disturbed. It will not have the <br />surcharge load removed. The ground water level will fluctuate in this azea but the pore water <br />pressure in the bedrock will remain relatively unchanged. These are all important factors in <br />determining the strength of a clay material. <br />3. It is impossible to perform a soils test (direct shear test) on an undisturbed sample of this <br />material. Simply by sampling the material the characteristics of the "in situ" claystone material <br />has been altered. A direct sheaz test can be performed on a remolded sample of the bedrock but <br />this test is not indicative of the strength associated with an undisturbed sample. <br />11990 Grant St. • Suite 304 • Denver, CO 80233 5441 Boeing Drive. • Suite 200 • Loveland, CO 80536-8855 <br />(303) 452-6611 • Fax (303) 452-2759 (970) 461-9884 • Fax (970) 613-1177 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.