My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE102678
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE102678
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:56:29 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 9:06:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2000113
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/28/2000
Doc Name
MAMM CREEK GRAVEL PIT ROARING FORK RESOURCES INC FILE NO M-2000-113
From
BALAZ & ASSOCIATES INC
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Gregg Squire <br />Page 3 <br />December 21, 2000 <br />Item 4 -Placement of stockpiles. The application showed topsoil and product stockpiles out of <br />the floodplain where possible. However the project site does not contain sufficient area to allow <br />tlus to happen for all stockpiles. When topsoil piles are placed in the floodplain they will be <br />located as far as practical from the main channel of the river, located with the long axis of the pile <br />parallel to the flood flow, and spaces will be left in between piles if the length of the pile exceeds <br />50 feet. <br />The in-pit crushing and screening operations will require stockpiling of pit run and product <br />material in the pit bottom. The pit bottoms are below grade as are the stockpiles. The pits <br />increase the cross section area for flood waters significantly compared to flowing across the <br />undisturbed ground. For instance if the flood depth ranges from 0.3 to 4 feet and the pit is 15 feet <br />deep this represents an increase in cross sectional area from 3.75 to 50 times. Because of this <br />large increase in cross sectional and the stockpiles being below grade, the stockpiles in the pits are <br />not expected to adversely affect the flow pattern of a flood inundating the pits. <br />Item 5 -Barriers. The barriers used in the pit design have nothing to do with flood control. <br />These barriers are essentially buffers of the undisturbed ground around the proposed pits to <br />protect man-made resources, wildlife habitat, primarily large cottonwoods, wetlands and aquatic <br />habitat where possible. These non-flood control barriers are shown on the Exhibits C-1 and C-2. <br />Item 6 -Facilities and stockpiles. The operator has proposed one facility area in the Dry Creek <br />mining area. This facility area includes <br />• Portable scale and house <br />• Concrete batch plant <br />• Asphalt plant <br />• Concrete products manufacturing <br />• Sand and gravel stockpiles <br />• Office trailer <br />• Portable shop <br />In addition to this facility area, the operation will utilize in-pit crushing and screening equipment <br />and a portable scale and scale house at the entrance to the active mining areas. The facilities in <br />the Dry Creek mining area are out of the floodplain. The stockpiles in the pits are addressed in <br />Item 4 above. <br />Item 7 - O1F site impacts. The Grant Brothers pit is located upstream approximately 7400 feet on <br />the south side of the river from the proposed eastern edge of the west property line to horse fence <br />mining area. Two other gravel pits are on the north side of the river. One is across from the west <br />end mining area and the other is slightly downstream from the first pit. All gravel pits are not <br />mining in the active main channel of the river. Portions or all of these pits are in the 100 year <br />floodplain. The proposed Mamm Creek Gravel Pit is not expected to impact any of these pits. <br />The responses provided to Mr. Allen Sorenson's review comments support this conclusion. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.