My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE102588
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE102588
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:56:25 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 8:59:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1994082
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
Pond 010 Geotechnical Report and Summary
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 13 Attachment 13-3A.2 Addendum 13-3A-E
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Meazurement of the groundwater level was made in the test hole by lowering a weighted tape into the open <br />hole shortly after completion of the drilling. The depth to the groundwater measured is shown on the Log of <br />Exploratory Tes[ Hole. <br />LABORATORYINVESTIGATiON <br />The laboratory investigation was conducted to study the engineering characteristics of the materials obtained in <br />the test hole and two relatively undisturbed hand drive samples which were obtained during the construction of <br />the embankment. This section includes a discussion of the laboratory test procedures, figures and tables <br />presenting the actual test results. ' <br />Samples obtained from the test hole were examined and classified in the laboratory by the project engineer. <br />Laboratory testing included standard property tests such az natural moisture contents, dry density, grain size <br />analyses, liquid and plaz[ic limits and strength tests. Results of the laboratory testing program are shown on <br />Figures #2 & #3 and are summarized in Table 1. The laboratory testing was conducted in general accordance <br />with recognized test procedures, primarily [hose of the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). <br />index Properties: [n order to identify soils and classify them into categories of similar engineering properties, <br />the Unified Soil Classification System (ASTM D-2487) was used. This system is based on index property tests, <br />including the determination of natural water content (ASTM D-2216), liquid limits (ASTM D-423), plastic <br />limits (ASTM D-424) and grain size distribution (ASTM D-422). Results of the moisture content, dry density, <br />Atterberg limits and the percent of soil passing the U.S. No. 200 sieve are presented in Table 1. <br />Unconfined Compressive Strength: Unconfined compressive strength testing was conducted on samples of the • <br />embankment fdl materials, as well as a sample of the natural clays. Each sample was prepared by cutting the <br />end of [he specimen parallel to each other and at right angles to the longitudinal axis of the core. Load was <br />applied continuously and without shock to produce a constant rate of deformation while the test was performed. <br />Results of the unconfined compressive strength testing are discussed later in this report and are summarized in <br />Table 1. <br />Triaxial Shear Tes[ine: Triaxial shear testing was on performed on relatively undisturbed samples of the natural <br />clays taken from below the embankment. In addition, triaxial shear testing was completed on remolded <br />samples of the embankment materials. The test consisted of subjecting a cylindrical specimen to an all-around <br />pressure and an axial load varied independently of the all-around pressure. The all-around pressure was <br />applied in a fluid-idled chamber and the axial load was applied by means of a piston passing through the <br />chamber top. The specimens were tested after triaxial chamber pressures were increased to the desired <br />confining pressure. Axial load and sample strain were monitored az the axial load was increased to failure. <br />Results of the triaxial tests are presented in Figures #2 and #3 and are discussed later in this report. <br />SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS <br />Based on our observations made at the site and the compaction tests taken during the construction of the <br />embankment, and our observation of the test hole drilled in the center of the dam, it appears that the majority <br />o[ the Gll materials consisted of clays which were slightly sandy to sandy with occasional sandstone fragments, ~ . <br />low to moderately plastic, stiff to very stiff, moist and brown in color. The clay Fill materials generally classified-~ <br />JoM1 No. 95-2784 Northwest Colorado Consultants. Inc. Poge <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.