Laserfiche WebLink
• -21- • <br />Turner: owner to prove that there is. <br />Shelton: All I'm saying is that if an operator can show that... <br />Turner: Yes. <br />Sadler: Ire the regulations, the burdei: of proof is placed upon the applicant... <br />Turner: I think it should be too,but I'm jest trying to answer the... <br />Sadler: I'm just... and I think it's a very semantical question, and I <br />don't know how you think you'd have the... I mean to have to decide <br />that in fact there is, it has been adversely affected, I think... <br />Turner: I agree, I think the burden shouldn't be on you. <br />Shelton: I'm asking the same question because I've .lever known your inter- <br />pretation. Forgetting your particular case, what you're saying is <br />that we ran never have permanent operation if there is a structure <br />within 200 feet,and I've never known tl~ut interpretation, and that's <br />w1~at you're implying. <br />Turner: Olcay, there's a lot more to this, because if a person f~as a s~ructure <br />2:?0 feet away that is damaged by explosions etc. etc. ... <br />Shelton: Tiat's offside damage. <br />