My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE102024
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE102024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:56:05 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 8:25:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2001001
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/12/2003
Doc Name
Staff Reccomendation to Approve with Conditions
From
DMG
To
Various
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman 6t., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 <br />FA%: (303) 832-6106 <br />Date: December 12, 2003 <br />To: Wally Erickson <br />DIVISION OF <br />MINERALS <br />GEOLOGY <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING•SAFETY <br />Bill Owens <br />Governor <br />Greg E. Walther <br />Exewrive Director <br />From: Harr Pose Ronald W. Cottony <br />y y Acting Division Director <br />Subject: Water Quality Review, Four States Aggregates, LLC, Line Camp Pit, M-2001-001 <br />This assessment refers to the data report from Souder Miller and Associates (SMA) to Nathan Barton <br />dated November 26, 2003. This correspondence and the lab results list iina ba Ltd. as the analytical lab. <br />This assessment also reviews the report on water and soil sampling prepared by Nathan A. Barton, which <br />was received in the Durango Field Office December 9, 2003. <br />At issue is whether the Line Camp pit operations may change water quality such that discharge of pit <br />water to surface streams would adversely affect the hydrologic balance. For most streamside pits such as <br />Line Camp, the CDPHE-WQCC requires that discharge waters be analyzed for very few parameters, <br />those usually being TSS, temperature and discharge rate. In some cases, pH and conductivity are <br />required, and in special cases WQCC requires other specific metal parameters. <br />It is recognized that the Board, through DMG, has responsibility for seeing that operators minimize <br />impacts to the hydrologic balance. At a minimum, this means that DMG must assure that operations <br />regulate the source of contaminants. It is further recognized that CDPHE-WQCC is responsible for <br />regulating the discharge of contaminants. Given these parallel but separate responsibilities, there is <br />significant precedent for DMG to have mining operations measure water quality at mines and compare <br />that water quality to stream standards for local receiving streams in order to determine whether source <br />controls are being implemented. This procedure does not in any way presume that DMG or the Board <br />have taken on responsibility for enforcing regulations of the WQCC. <br />The data report lists analyses for three samples: <br />River water <br />Pond water <br />Pond sediment <br />The two water samples were analyzed for some major elements plus TDS and TSS by the dissolved <br />method, plus oil and grease and diesel and oil range organics. The sediment sample was analyzed for <br />TCLP metals by ICP. <br />Mr. Barton's report addresses the SMA data. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.