My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE101568
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE101568
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:55:48 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 8:03:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
8/4/2005
Doc Name
CSU/DMG Permanent Shrub Plots
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 13 Appendix 13-11
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• In June 2005, a Final Technical Pmgnrr Report to the Shrub Ertablirhment Study was prepared by Mazk W. <br />Paschke and Edwazd F. Redente (Department of Forest, Rangeland and Watershed Stewardship, <br />Colorado State University). The following discussion and details include excerpts from this report as <br />they relate to the Seneca II Mine study. The report in its entirety is included as Attachment A, Shrub <br />Establishment Study. <br />SENECA II DEMONSTRATION SHRUB PLOTS <br />Local climate is characteristic of semi-arid steppe regions with average pzedpitation ranging from <br />16.1 inches to 18 inches at the mines, and increases with local elevation. Soils aze typical of soils <br />found in cold, semi-arid regions of the western United States. They aze moderately deep (20 to 40 <br />inches) to shallow (10-20 inches). The dominant vegetation types aze sagebrush grasslands and <br />mountain shrublands. Girrent and historic ]and uses in the vianity of these operations is grazing for <br />livestock, and wildlife habitat. Herds of mule deer and elk are common, especially on reclaimed azeas <br />during the winter. <br />The treatments used in the field study are designed to overcome the two primary obstacles to shrub <br />establishment -competition from aggressive herbaceous spades and browsing. The herbaceous <br />competition is primarily from introduced cool season grass species. These species aze reliable and <br />serve as quick erosion control. They thrive where topsoil is replaced and become well established, <br />ofren at the expense of other desirable species. Seed mixes for the demonstration plots were carefully <br />evaluated to eliminate the competitive introduced species and include native spades. Strip seeding <br />was used to isolate the shrub spades to further reduce competition from the herbaceous spades. <br />Topsoil depths were varied and included seeding directly on spoil. This was done to reduce the <br />• competition from herbaceous species that thrive where topsoH bas been replaced and to better <br />represent the rocky substrate found in the typical habitat of several of the shrub species. <br />Young shrub plants aze highly desirable browse fox deer and elk. Since the reclaimed lands aze <br />located in heavily used wildlife habitat, the deer and elk are drawn to the wide open fields of <br />reclamation. To determine the impact of wildlife browsing, half of each treatment was fenced. <br />Seneca II Specific Plot Construction <br />The test plots at Seneca are located adjacent to each other in one contiguous block in the Wadge Pit <br />azea (UTM 13T 322555 4476182) at an average elevation of 7600 feek The selected site for the kest <br />plots has an east aspect. Each treatment measures 100 feet by 100 feet. A schematic of the study <br />plot layout is included in Attachment A, Shrub Establishment Study, on Figure 4, Shrub <br />Establishment Demonstration Plots at Seneca Mine. Elk proof fencing of the study was completed <br />in the spring of 2001. The fence was installed in such a fashion that treatments 2, 4 and 5 have <br />fenced and unfenced plots. <br />Seneca II SpeciSc Field Trial Details <br />A description of each treatment is presented below. It should be noted that one treatment originally <br />proposed was modified. The proposed treatment of no topsoil with seeding and transplanting was <br />replaced with a treatment of no topsoil and transplanting, without the seeding. Spades of transplants <br />used were boxeldet maple, Saskatoon serviceberry, black d~okecherry, C~atnble oak, Wood's rose, <br />skunkbush sumac and mountain snowberty. All shrub transplants used at the Seneca demonstration <br />• plots were grown from local seed sources by Bitterroot Restoration, Inc. and were inoculated with a <br />local soil community to fadlitate the establishment of appropriate root microsymbionts. <br />MR-52 ]3-]1-2 July 2005 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.