My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE101494
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE101494
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:55:45 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 7:59:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 50 Supplemental
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Ms. Paige Seville -6- December 17, 1984 <br />(5) revegetation". Specific attention should be paid to any item of <br />significant design importance while completing inspections, regardless of <br />whether they are exposed during the specific quarterly inspection. <br />6. The applicant proposes a monitoring program limited to monitoring of <br />two ground water wells and the installation and monitoring of several <br />piezometers within the structure. The Division finds this monitoring proposal <br />.~ to be seriously deficient. In light of the downslope existing landslide and <br />~w the general concerns for surficial and possible deeper stability problems, the <br />,~^ Division believes it will be necessary to require a significantly more <br />~b - comprehensive stability monitoring program. Until the above addressed <br />~5~,,~W,,r.~ technical concerns are resolved, it will be difficult to discuss specific <br />N.,rn,,v, monitoring program components. However, the Division believes that, at a <br />WW`"''' minimum, slope movement survey monuments and/or tilt meter installations will <br />(. `) be necessary. <br />7. The permit revision application presents a bonding calculation for the <br />proposed disturbances. Depending upon the result of the final resolution of <br />some of the above-addressed concerns, the Division may require amendment of <br />the bonding proposed in order to include funds to support monitoring <br />activities in the event of forfeiture. <br />The Division requests that you consolidate your responses <br />be inserted into your permit application. At the end of <br />please ensure that the Office of Surface Mining in Denver <br />seven copies of the completed revision to keep their file <br />or your staff have any questions or would like to set up <br />contact me. <br />Sincerely, <br />_i -__-- <br />'Robert Liddle <br />Reclamation Specialist <br />RL/fw <br />cc: Mr. Jim Pendleton <br />Mr. Richard Holborook, OSM <br />Doc. No. 5997 <br />into a form that can <br />the review process <br />is provided with <br />up to date. If yu <br />a meeting please <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.