Laserfiche WebLink
<br />April 29, 1986 <br />Mr. Gregg R. Squire <br />Mined Land Reclamation Division <br />423 Centennial Bldg. <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />RE: Empire Energy Corporation Technical Revision - Access to "E" Seam, <br />Mine No. 6 Development, File No. C-81-044 <br />• Dear Mr. Squire: <br />This material is submitted in response to the issues raised in your <br />adequacy review letter dated April 10, 1986. Each of the issues are <br />followed by Empire's responses. <br />Hydrology <br />1. Cover letter, paragraph 5, sentence 3: If the inflow estimates are <br />for development work only then why are these referenced to the 1 - 5 <br />year and 6 - 10 year mine plans. The development phase should be <br />separated out and examined individually, then compared to the alter <br />mining phases in a separate narrative. <br />RESPONSE: <br />The estimates presented in the cover letter were informational only. The <br />"development" phase (E Seam Access) is addressed separately in the actual <br />Technical Revision documents. <br />2. There is no aquifer analysis based on the concept of multiple <br />completions even though this would be the case during development of <br />mpireEnergy Corporation <br />PO 30%+B :;R+~O COLOR>DO i'~2c <br />]0]~d1~~B Z<6 <br />