My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE101173
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE101173
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:55:34 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 7:40:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1989074
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
2.05.6.3 PROBABLE HYDROLOGIC CONSEQUENCES
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• The specific conductance measures the ability of the water to conduct electricity which <br />is directly related to the dissolved ion content of the water. All three wells showed an <br />increase in conductivity during the later part of 1993, probably due to the extremely dry <br />conditions that existed during this time throughout Colorado. However, in the Spring <br />of 1994, the conductivity of the Montoya well and Well 29-4 dropped significantly <br />while that of the USGS well increased significantly. This is difficult to explain since <br />the Montoya well is located only 1000 feet south of the USGS well and both are north <br />(downstream) of the permit area. Checking into possible explanations for this TDS at <br />the USGS well showed that the entire disturbed area was hydromulched for reclamation <br />in the second quarter of 1994. Mark Kerr reported that 200 Ibs/acre of fertilizer was <br />used per acre in the hydromulching and seeding process. This is a normal hydromulch <br />fertilization rate per acre and normal water levels in the USGS well are the shallowest <br />in the area: usually from 18' to 20' from the surface. Also, the USGS well is located <br />immediately downstream and to the east of the fertilized area. However, it is not <br />possible that the fertilization caused an increase in the salts present in the shallow water <br />of this hole. See discussion in the Conclusions section. <br />Well pH levels are shown in the following graph for all three wells currently sampled. <br /> <br />Rimrock Mine <br />Well pH <br />• <br />N <br />10.00 <br />s.7s <br />9.50 <br />9.25 <br />9.00 <br />8.75 <br />8.50 <br />8.25 <br />8.00 <br />7.75 <br />7.50 <br />7.25 <br />C <br />J <br />n <br />7.00 <br />6/88 8/88 10/88 12/88 3/89 5/69 7/93 9/93 12/93 1194 4/94 7/94 12/94 <br />Well 29-4 ~MOntoya Well u*'~USGS Well <br />All samples 5/89 and earlier are before mine startup <br />1/12/95 <br />2.07(11 Page 12 <br />Montoya <br />Well Dry <br />12/94 <br />-rF <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.