My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE101125
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE101125
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:55:32 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 7:37:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2002059
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
8/14/2002
Doc Name
Rationale for Recommendation for Approval Over Objections
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
/SSUES RAISED AFTER THE INITIAL COMMENT PERIOD <br />No addition issues have been raised after the initial comment period. <br />ISSUES RAISED DURING THE INITIAL COMMENT PERIOD THAT THE DIVISION <br />BELIEVES ARE NOT WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE DIVISION OR BOARD <br />1. "Noise, dust, truck traffic and visual impacts" -Items 1,2,3,4,5,9 and 10 of the objector's June 25, 2002 letter. <br />Response -The DMG has no authority over noise, truck traffic or visual issues, the County may have some control <br />over these issues. The DMG does have some control over loss of soil from topsoil stockpiles through erosion, the <br />applicant has committed to stabilize these stockpiles 6y seeding them. Other dust issues should be addressed to the <br />State Air Pollution Control Division. <br />2. "The application states that the access road a public road, yet we pay a lease to the State Land Boazd to use that road <br />as do our neighbors, the Noonans." -Item 6 of the objector's June Z5, 2002 letter. <br />Response - The only portion of this issue that the DMG has any control over is to insure that the applicant has a <br />legal tight of access. Since the applicant has a lease with the State Land Board, the DMG has no further requirements <br />regarding this question <br />ISSUES THAT WERE RAISED AFTER THE INITIAL COMMENT PERIOD THAT THE DIVISION <br />BELIEVES ARE NOT WITHIN THE .1 URISD/CTION OF THE DIVISION OR BOARD <br />None <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.