My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE101085
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE101085
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:55:31 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 7:33:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2000158
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/27/2001
Doc Name
FORMAL PUBLIC HEARING PLATTE SAND GRAVEL LLC S H MINE FN M-2000-158 NEW 112 APPLICATION
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />March 23. 2001. The report is based on a I-acre starter pit that will be excava[ed below the water table to a <br />depth of 25 feet. During construction of the I-acre pt[, water will be removed by pumping from the low areas <br />where water accumulates. Once the starter pit is mined, a dredge will be constructed in the pit. Dew'atering will <br />cease, and dredging ("wet minins_") will begin from that point in time. To further minimize impacts, Platte Sand <br />& Gravel w'iII commit to mining in each dewa[ering area in earl}' summer so that aquifer dewatering is complete <br />prior [o the next irrigation season and mining will be conducted in each lake area as Far from the wells as <br />possible and as close to the river as practical. The applicant will need to submit an additional hydrologic <br />assessment if changes to the dewatering plan are necessary (including dry mining greater than 1-acre in size or <br />installing an upgradient recharee facility). At that time, the Division will review the impacts to the hydrologic <br />balance and surrounding well owners. <br />Platte Sand & Gravel committed to not expose groundwater until a well permit is issued by the Office of the <br />State Engineer ("OSE"). The applicant states that a Temporary Substiwte and Supply Plan and well permit have <br />been filed wi[h the OSE. In the Temporary Substi[ute and Supply Plan, the applicant will commit to buying <br />water from Longmont to cover the industrial and evaporative uses associated with the operation during the first <br />five years. The applicant agreed to submit copies of the contract to the Division once they are available. The <br />applicant has committed that groundwater will not be exposed until they have received necessary approvals from <br />the OSE. <br />Mr. Ptasnik (objector) hired a consultant, Leaf Engineering, [o detertnine the impacts of the proposed S & H <br />mining operation to the surrounding well owners. The analysis prepared b}' Leaf Engineering dated February 28. <br />2001 is based on drawdown calculations for the dry pit mining after 365 days of continuous dry mining in an <br />average cell consisting of approximately 45 acres. The result of the analysis depicts potential injury to all of Mr. <br />Ptasnik's wells at the end of the 90-day pumping period for the wells and the 365 days of continuous pit <br />dewatering. The applicant has commi«ed to a dewatering pit of no greater than I-acre in size, significantly less <br />than the analysis prepared by Leaf Engineering. <br />3. Presence of wetlands, necessary mitigation and need jot 404 permit. (Michael Ptasnik; and Scott, Brochard, <br />Depratt, Oder+bar+gh, Reinick & Rippe) <br />• "l have major concerns regarding the wetlands in the applicants permit. It has been relatively dn' over the past <br />few rears. but there is no question multiple areas of wedands erirt in the m~eas requested jar mining. The <br />appficwu has contpletek ignored the presence of wetlands slating that a U.S. Corps of Engineers permit is »or <br />required." (Michael Ptasnik; Febnran' 7, 200!) <br />• "The application should provide a sire specific rerien and idenrificariort oJjurisdictional wetlands prior to <br />grmuing the permit. This study should be undertaken 6r'a neutral third pam agency" (Scott, Brochnrd, <br />Depratt. Odenbmrgl+, Reinick & Rippe; Februnn~ l4, 2001) <br />Division Response- A preliminary wetlands study was completed by ERO Resources in 2000, and a copy of the <br />wetlands identification map was submitted to the Division titled. "Platte Sand & Gravel LLC Adequacy Exhibit <br />5 Wetlands Map." Platte Sand & Gravel states that they will not impact the wetland areas at [his time. A letter <br />dated April 1, 2001 from the Department of the Army Corps of Engineers states that the area to be mined in the <br />next I S years is not a wetland. If and when a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 404 Permit is issued, the applicant <br />has agreed to submit it [o the Division to de[etmine what course of action will be needed regarding the <br />reclamation plan and the reclamation cost estimate. <br />4. 100 year flood plain analysis, mitigation and set back requirements. (Michael Ptasnik; and Scott, Brochard, <br />Depratt, Odenbaugh, Reinick & Rippe) <br />• "This entire area is in the /00 rear flood plaht. As recent/y as three Bears ago, htutdreds ajthese acres sere <br />flooded and inaccessible for weeks. Approsirrmteh 25 years ago, this entire area ,vas Jlooded and wider venter. <br />The rirerbmtks in the spring erode regulnrRt mid the ricer path courirwes m change significanth~. Forq~ acres <br />ojriverbank were lost four years ago during spring Jloodirtg. Please do not allow the appficnnr to minimize the <br />historical, ten! floodir+g thur regularly occurs in this area. " (Alichael Pmsnik; Februan' 7, 2001) <br />"The proposed sire is entirely ,cidrirt the 100-rearflood plain for the Sonth Plante. The applicant shmdd provide <br />a derailed plan of operation ,which veil! protect adjacent and dox~nstrenm residents from mine or plant produced <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.