My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE101065
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE101065
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:55:30 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 7:33:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2000113
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/5/2001
Doc Name
MAMM CREEK GRAVEL PIT ROARING FORK RESOURCES INC FILE NO M-2000-113
From
BALAZ & ASSOCIATES INC
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Gregg Squire • • <br />Page 2 <br />January 2, 2001 <br />Water that is discharged from the wet screening or processing plant will be treated in one of two <br />ways. <br />1. Pumped to historically irrigated pasture and used to water the pasture areas. <br />2. Water is pumped or directed in pipes to either an in pit settling pond or the <br />portion of the pit that is filling with groundwater. If the pond is used, the <br />ponds are nominally 125 feet by 125 feet. The operator visually inspects the <br />ponds to see if the solids are settling. If the solids are not settling fast enough, <br />the operator uses a flocculant to facilitate settling. If the flooded portion of the <br />pit is used, then the solids are removed either by settling to the pit bottom or <br />being removed by the filtering action of the undisturbed sand and grave] as the <br />groundwater moves from the pit area. <br />The choice of the treatment option for the wet screen plant discharge water depends on the <br />location of the in pit facilities relative to historically irrigated fields, the amount of pit area mined, <br />the amount of groundwater in the pit bottom, and the production rate. The operator would like <br />to keep several treatment options open due to the potential to move the in pit crushing and <br />screening plants more than once during the mining life of the pit to minimize haul distances and to <br />be better able to handle the changing pit and mining conditions. A specific layout of the in pit <br />facilities is difficult to provide because it will likely change over the life of the pit to provide the <br />most cost effective in pit crushing and screening operation including treatment of screen plant <br />water discharge. <br />If there are any discharges to the Colorado River of treated water then these will be in compliance <br />with an NPDES permit. The operator is currently preparing an NPDES permit and will not <br />discharge water until this permit is in place. The prevention, containment and or cleanup of any <br />spills from the in pit facilities and the surface facilities including the asphalt plant will be discussed <br />in the Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasures Plan that is being developed. <br />Please feel free to contact us at the above address if you have any questions concerning this <br />submittal. <br />Sincerely, <br />Balaz & Associates, Inc.. <br />~~~~~~~ <br />William P. Balaz Jr., P. E. <br />President <br />cc: Steve Wujek, Knight Planning <br />Dick Stephenson & John Martin, Roaring Fork Resources <br />Scott Balcomb, Balcomb and Green <br />Selby Myers, City of Rifle <br />file:\bill\mamm\gsdmgresponsets2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.