My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE101034
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE101034
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:55:29 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 7:31:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1997054
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/16/1998
Doc Name
ISSUES THE DIV BELIEVES ARE NOT WITHIN THE JURISDITION OF THE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
,~~~~wt ~ Pie ~e~ ~. ~~~~e,-~~~.~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ <br />Issues the Division Believes Are iVot Within the Jurisdiction of the E 999 <br />1. Safety hazard of being a collector highway (U.S. Highway 50); trucks on County Road 157 and <br />the highway <br />2. Changes the basic character and use of ]and at Pazkdale <br />County Planning and Zoning Boazd, by approving the operation, failed to protect the utility and <br />value and future of the land at Pazkdale <br />4. Adverse impacts on air quality <br />5. The maps aze misleading in the designation of nearby buildings as ranch houses, when they aze <br />really buildings associated with the D & RG and of some historic significance. <br />6. The location is incompatible to non-motorized traffic on the river and would cause yeaz-round <br />serious traffic congestion on the highway. <br />The mining operation would cost Fremont County more to monitor various needs than it could <br />ever bring benefit. <br />8. Aggregate mine's non-compliance with the Fremont County's master plan for preserving scenic <br />Highway 50 -Arkansas River Corridor. <br />9. Possible affects of the proposed project on recreation and tourism industries aze not addressed. <br />10. The proposed project should give some consideration to the effects of the mine on visual <br />resources. <br />11. Blasting, crushing, screening and loading will create a sever noise problem affecting the <br />experience of azea visitors. <br />12. It is premature to place complete reliance on the transportation of the product almost entirely <br />upon a potentially unavailable rail service. <br />13. The hours of operation. <br />14. Washing down the dust from the gravel pit operation with 30,000 gallons per day of water is <br />not a good use of a limited resource. <br />15. Objection to the location of the proposed mining operation. <br />16. Over 70 commercial outfitters are dependent on the Parkdale site, trading a clean industry for a <br />dirty one which will only profit a few. We ought not to let this happen. <br />17. Economic and quality of life concerns. <br />Issues the Division Believes Are Within the Jurisdiction of the Board <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.