PERMFILE100850 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

•~ .. any event, any minerals disturbed by the sand and gravel opera- tion are still there except for the pit run gravel hauled to Telluride Sand and Gravel. Defendant/Intervenors claim no mineral interest in the property and testified Plaintiff/- Intervenors can mine the property if they wish. The Plaintiffs owned the subject property for a period of approximately five years and Plaintiffs Rudy M. Groom and T. L. Godwin are functioning as trustees for the San Miguel Ranch Trust which owned the property. This property is scattered over a 30-mile area as depicted on the maps and includes the placer claims located on the San Miguel River, some property on the Uncompahgre Plateau and a winter range in Paradox Valley. Testimony indicated the Plaintiffs owned numerous water rights, ditch rights, grazing permits for the BLM and Forest ground, certain improvements upon the property, equipment and approxi- mately a thousand head of cattle. Over the five-year period owned by Plaintiffs, the ranch was operated as a cow-calf opera- tion and involved, to some extent, a dude ranch operation and guiding and outfitting services for hunting. Hay and corn was raised on approximately 350 acres of the placer claims which later included an additional SO to 60 acres. The surface area of the claims, apart from the 400 to 410 acres of hay and farm ground, was described as suitable for grazing and consisting primarily of steep and rolling terrain without much [op soil, with spots of large rocks and outcroppings along the river area. The farm ground was described as sandy, loamy areas, generally level with shallow top soil together with lots of rocks in the fields like Che other farm ground in the surrounding area. The testimony established that the patented mining claims comprised approximately 80% of the value of the whole ranch and accounted for approximately 34 to 35% of the total land area. George Glasier testified that the primary functioning and focus of the ranch was to operate as a ranch. Plaintiff Groom testified much the same way. The ranch accommodated a thousand cow/calf units and the mining claims served as the base land for the grazing permits. While approximately 400 to 410 acres of the mining claims have been used for farming operations to grow row crops and hay, the evidence established that sand and gravel and rock is present throughout the soil comprising the mining claims. The 31 photographs admitted into evidence, taken by Mr. Glasier and marked with corresponding numbers on the map, show that sand and gravel, together with rock outcroppings, are commonly dispersed throughout the mining claims. Mr. Glasier testified chat he commonly uses a rock picker to clean the fields from rocks and does this each spring. He further testified the soil was shallow with rocks strewn underneath the mining claims. Witnesses Lee 3