My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE100774
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE100774
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:55:20 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 7:20:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
7/15/2002
Doc Name
Requirements for Project
From
USFS
To
MCC
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 80 Drilling Activities - TR96
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br />~~ United Stales Forest Paonia P.O. Box 1030 <br />s <br />~ <br />~ ~ Department of Service Ranger District N Rio Grande Ave. <br /> Agriculture PHONE NO. 970-527-4131 Paonia, CO 81428 <br /> FAX 970-527-4151 <br />File Code: 2820 <br />Date: February 7, 2002 <br />Mr. Phil G. Schmidt <br />Manager of Engineering and Environmental Affairs <br />Mountain Coal Company, L.L.C. <br />PO.Box 591 <br />5174 Highway 133 <br />Somerset, CO 81434 <br />Dear Mr. Schmidt, <br />Representatives from the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) attended a meeting at the West Elk Mine <br />regarding the new Sylvester Gulch road proposal. The attendants of the meeting included <br />Wendell Koontz, and Henry Barbe of Mountain Coal Company (MCC). Kim Kaal, Doug <br />Marah, George Goehl, and John Williams of the USFS. Tom Griepentrog of Buckhorn Geotech, <br />and Byron Walker of the Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology (CDMG). <br />During the meeting, the proposal for the Sylvester Gulch road was presented by MCC and <br />Buckhorn Geotech of Montrose Colorado. The proposed road alignment was also field verified <br />and appeared to be flagged by surveyors. <br />Some of the observations made by the U.S. Forest Service Engineers and Geologist, were that <br />the proposed road appeared to be within 100 feet of the stream, in the riparian azea, and that the <br />road was located in proximity to slopes with northerly and easterly exposure: These slopes <br />appeared slide prone with visible and active slide scalps on the western Sylvester Gulch slope, <br />and appear to be wet and heavily vegetated. Based on the field observations made on January <br />30, 2002, the Forest Service is rejecting the new proposed Sylvester Gulch Road alignment. It <br />was a consensus opinion of all on the field review that the proposed route will not meet the <br />environmental or engineering requirements of the USFS nor CDMG, and will not provide a <br />stable, long-term access. <br />Observations made during the field inspection indicated the slopes with southerly and westerly <br />exposure were steep, but reasonably dry and stable, and had predominantly oak vegetation (with <br />one isolated stand of Cottonwood trees). This potential road corridor was described by the USFS <br />and discussed with Henry Barbe, Mountain Coal Company Environmental Engineer. The USFS <br />will require road construction to be out of the riparian areas as much as possible, with close to <br />right-angle crossings of Sylvester Gulch, and if necessazy the road maybe constructed in the <br />areas with 40% or greater slopes if they have a southerly or westerly dry exposure. <br />The Forest Service is imposing the following requirements for the new proposed Sylvester Gulch <br />road: <br />Road Specifications <br />U 5 Caring for the Land and Serving People Primetl on Recydetl Paper ~~~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.