Laserfiche WebLink
4.0 DISCUSSIO?; ;~';J Cv:'.CUJSICCS <br />Factors that may influence results and conclLSionshave been discussed in the <br />l • <br />previous semi-annual report (Erickson, A;ay 19 T) and are not repeated here except <br />as the;; e,ey have changed. <br />4.1 RSL;TIO';SHI° OF LL;T~t CU~.LIT'Y °?SULTS TO <br />{;A' ~°, ;U,',I.TTY G'JID~.TI`.~S FUS TFn' Si:,'r' OF CJ:A?1,DO <br />The Colorado 4later Cuality Control Co :~issior. published water quality guide- <br />lines in the summer of 197x. These guidelines have dust recently been amended, <br />although there has not yet been ar~}~ new publications issued. <br />Until hearings are held, the l;orth Fork Trill ramain under the old stares ands <br />that designate the t]orth Fork as B-1 waters, suitable for all uses but priT~ary <br />contact, F~nen they are adopted} there is evidence that the probable new state <br />standards Sor several of the paras~eters co•,:ld be er.ceeded in the i;orth For}: because <br />~• of high concentrations periodically origi_-iating frog above the contro'_ area on the <br />North Fork a^d froo control areas on Stevens (~1ch. Violations in the North Fork <br />airing Done resulting fror~ n:noff from the sin= site could, but are not likely <br />to occur because of the trapping action oS sedir.:entation ponds being constructed. <br />It is like],y that violations of fecal colifc:-.•LS grill occur in the T7orth Fork from <br />the orchard near the coal loadout area i.i' steps are not taken to control carping <br />by fruit pickers or provide sanitation. facilities. <br /> <br />4-1 <br />