My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE100212
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE100212
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:55:02 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 6:53:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981307
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/17/1982
Doc Name
BRODERICK & GIBBONS FOUNTAIN PIT FN 81-307
From
MLRD
To
WESTERN PAVING CONSTRUCTION CO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />r <br />Ric naro D Lamm <br />Governor <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 999 <br />D MOnle Pascoe beculive Oveclor <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />DAVID C. SHELTON Director ~_ <br />February 17, 1482 <br />Mr. Frank M. Craham, Jr. <br />Western Paving Construction Company <br />1900 West 64th Avenue <br />P.O. Box 21649 <br />Denver, Colorado 80221 <br />Re: Broderick & Gibbons - "Fountain <br />Pit", Our File No. 81-307 <br />n"y1 E-~. <br />Dear ~e-hTm: <br />I have reviewed the responses to my adequacy letter of January 13, 1982, <br />and have a Few more points of clarification. I should also mention that I <br />still need the proofs of publication and notification of adjacent landowners. <br />I will use my same exhibit letter and question number designations as in my <br />letter of January 13th. <br />Exhibit C <br />2. The new phases you have described on the new mining plan map seem more <br />realistic, considering the nature of the gravel deposit. Considering this fact <br />and the large size of the phases outlined, two points should be made very clear: <br />1) At any given time, no more than 60 acres (30 acres moderate and 30 acres <br />major) will be allowed to be disturbed under the terms of the permit. This <br />means that large areas of the phase must remain totally undisturbed or the <br />•, operator will be in violation. 2) The operator must remain within the phase <br />"'for which he is bonded and cannot follow the gravel deposit outside of that <br />phase, even if the disturbance is still within the permitted acreage. Any <br />change in phasing will require a revision to the permit. In general, my concern <br />is that this type of somewhat diffuse disturbance description may be difficult for <br />the operator to maintain in the field. However, keeping the factors mentioned <br />above in mind, I feel that the sequence of disturbance that you have described <br />will be satisfactory. <br />3. Roads within the stages will be considered moderate disturbance on the <br />affected land and will be bonded as such. This should figure in when bond <br />\/ (and disturbance) calculations are done. I presume that, since the operator <br />/ will use the existing access road along the utilities corridor, that permission <br />to use this corridor has been secured. Zn this regard, how much improvement <br />is to be done to this road? <br />9. The operator should commit, in a general way, to using sediment control <br />methods, as necessary, to protect drainages during mining and reclamation. <br />Preciselocations of structures will not need to be shown, however. <br />Exhibits E and F <br />4. I need further clarification as to the use of sediment and drainage control <br />/\ structures as a part of ongoing and final reclamation. Are such structures to <br />423 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel. (303) 866-3567 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.