My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL56423
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL56423
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:40:50 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 11:27:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
11/17/2004
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance for PR4
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
water to the creek. Furthermore, dependent upon local conditions, discharges from <br />the predicted spoils aquifer may infiltrate the Hubberson Gulch alluvium. This <br />water may flow through the alluvium downgradient to recharge the Dry Creek <br />alluvium from which Olson Spring issues. <br />It is projected by the applicant that, due to dilution, there will be no impact to <br />Olson Spring quality which may be attributed to mining. An alluvial cross-section <br />of wells in Hubberson Gulch upgradient of the spring will help monitor the advance <br />of any plume in that gulch. A water quality monitoring plan was initiated at Olson <br />Spring to provide baseline data and monitor impacts to this spring. <br />Ten springs which are present in or adjacent to the permit area were chosen for <br />further study. At each of these sites, three water quality and discharge <br />measurements were made during the summer and fall of 1983. Typically, quality <br />and quantity varied from spring to spring. <br />In general, the water was very hard with average TDS values ranging from 458 <br />mg/1 to 2,150 mg/1. Sulfate was generally more dominant than bicarbonate. All <br />but two springs experienced a decline in flow during the course of the summer. <br />Five had dried up by late August, three others flowed less water during base flow <br />and two were flowing at about the same rate in October as in June. <br />Three springs, Olson Spring (on Dry Creek), S-5 (on an 006 Gulch tributary), <br />and S-41 (in the 006 Gulch channel), were projected to be impacted by mining <br />within the original permit area. 5-41, which fed a registered stock pond <br />(Temple Pond No. 2) was mined through and was buried in spoils in 1998. <br />Pond 006 will replace the Temple Pond No. 2 as a stock water impoundment. <br />S-5 has been observed to flow on only three occasions; in the spring of <br />1983, 1997 and 1998. Olson Spring is an adjudicated domestic water right. <br />Conductivity of the Olson Spring has displayed a decreasing trend. <br />Two additional native springs occur along Hubberson Gulch upstream from <br />the potential influence of mining in the original permit area, but downstream <br />from mining activity in the south extension area. S~9 was located in the 016 <br />Gulch directly above the Pond 016 Site. The spring was developed with a 4 <br />inch PVC pipe that flowed into a metal stock tank. It was sampled between <br />August 1997 and August 2001, when it was abandoned and subsequently <br />mined through. S-7 serves as the non-potable water supply for the Smith <br />Ranch on Hubberson Gulch in Section 21. Sampling was discontinued in <br />1990 but reinitiated in 1999, due to its location downstream from south <br />extension area mining. S-7 conductivity displays an increasing trend. <br />Seneca II-W Findings Document 35 November 17, 2004 <br />Permit Revision No. 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.