Laserfiche WebLink
Mountain Coal Company <br />West Elk Mine <br />Post Office Box 597 <br />Somerset, Colorado 81434 <br />Telephone 970.9235n15 <br />III IIIIIIIIIIIII III <br />999 <br />/~ <br />!~FrF~`.~~ r; <br />December 3, 1997 <br />DEC 0 ~ ~g97 <br />Mr. Michael Boulay <br />Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Division c! f.§mBrz!s a L;;,;,~,~, <br />RE: Landslide Status and Planned Mitigation; West Elk Mine; <br />Permit No. C-80-007 <br />Dear Mike: <br />As we discussed on the telephone yesterday, the magnitude and duration of the <br />landslide at the West Elk Mine site in the main facilities area, has been greater this <br />year than in past yeazs. In the past, there has typically been a surge of movement in <br />the spring and only gradual "creep" type movement for the rest of the year. Previous <br />creep movement was on the order of 1-inch per yeaz. However, this year the surge of <br />movement in the spring was lazger, 0.5 to 1 inch per month, and has lasted longer <br />than normal. This increased movement is still continuing. The rate of movement is <br />now a threat for catastrophic failure. <br />Through the spring and summer months of this yeaz, an extensive drilling program <br />and some seismic work was conducted to define the landslide limits and mechanics. <br />The enclosed figure shows the limits of the IandsGde mass, based on the collected data <br />as well as conventional survey monitoring data. Piezometers and inclinometers have <br />also been installed around the mine site. Inclinometers have identified the majority of <br />nthe_movement in a shear zone of the landslide, which is about midway vertically <br />within the colluvium. As with most landslides, water appeazs to be the key <br />component. <br />MCC has been diligently studying and formulating a plan for the mitigation of the <br />landslide over the last several months, which has included the collection of data as <br />described above and involving several top geotechnical consulting firms. In review of <br />all the geotechnical data collected, the design of the landslide mitigation has focused <br />on dewatering and anchoring. The dewatering projects include stone columns, <br />vertical dewatering wells near the substation, horizontal drilled drains under the slide, <br />and improved drainage in the main entries near the portals. The anchoring projects <br />include augured caissons designed to anchor the slide to bedrock. The enclosed <br />drawing shows the proposed locations of the stone columns, horizontal drains, and <br />