My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL56340
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL56340
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:41:14 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 11:22:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1994117
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
3/1/1996
Doc Name
MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL OF RECORD
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4. The Firm has made numerous oral and written requests to the riamurts nor <br />payment (the most recent written request is attached as Exhibit 2). <br />5. The Plaintiffs have continually failed and refused to make payment to the Firm <br />and satisfy their obligations to the Fitm. <br />6. Because the Plaintiffs have deliberately disregarded an agreement and obligation <br />to the Firm, the Firm is authorized to withdraw as counsel of record pursuant to <br />Rule 1.16(b)(1)(F} of the Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct. <br />Failure to Cooperate <br />7. At page 4 of the Engagement Letter the Firm has informed the Plaintiffs that: <br />Our ([he Firm's) performance also depends, in part, <br />upon your cooperation in general, and particularly <br />upon prompt receipt of information as we request <br />them from you from time to time as the matter <br />progresses. (explanatory information supplied) <br />8. The Plaintiffs have repeatedly failed to respond to the Firm's requests for <br />discoverable information and to cooperate with the Firm in providing discoverable information <br />in this case. The Plaintiffs' conduct in this regard renders it unreasonably difficult for the Firm <br />to carry out the Firm's employment effectively. <br />9. Therefore, the Firm is authorized to withdraw as counsel of record pursuant to <br />Rule 1.16(b)(1)(D) of the Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct. <br />Chanee in Client <br />10. This Firm entered its appearance on behalf of Durango Metals and Hartley. Only <br />recently, and upon information and belief, the gold mine which is the subject matter of this <br />litigation, is no longer under the exclusive control of Durango Metals and Hartley. <br />11. Recent filings at the Attorney General's Office and the Mine Land Reclamation <br />Board indicate that there is "common control" of the Mogul Tunnel Mine by parties other than <br />Durango Metals. Apparently, and again upon information and belief, Durango Metals has <br />entered into agreements with other third parties. <br />12. After repeated requests for more clarification, the Firm is unable to confirm at <br />this time what involvement these other third parties have with the Mogul Tunnel Mine andlor <br />Durango Metals. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.