My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1994-12-29_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1980007
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
1994-12-29_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1980007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/6/2021 10:59:04 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 11:13:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
12/29/1994
Doc Name
Decision Doc Federal Lease
Permit Index Doc Type
Other Permits
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
145
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In addition, on the fee surface within the application area there <br /> are five adjudicated water rights. Within a mile of the tract <br /> boundary there are seven adjudicated water rights (see Map 4) . <br /> • The rights are for springs, reservoirs, ponds, wells., and <br /> ditches. <br /> Ground Water <br /> The potential for ground water occurrence, on the lease tract, <br /> exists in both the Mesaverde Formation and unconsolidated <br /> quaternary surface deposits of colluvium/alluvium. Within the <br /> Mesaverde Formation both the Rollins Sandstone and various coal <br /> members, depending on secondary porosity, can transmit ground <br /> water. However, with the geologic dip of the Mesaverde Formation <br /> being roughly 3.5 degrees to the north-northeast, ground water <br /> recharge would be limited to the aquifer along the southern <br /> flanks of Jumbo Mountain or from the 3-4 faults identified <br /> crossing the lease tract. <br /> All but two of the springs, reservoirs, ponds and ditches <br /> mentioned in the Surface Water section are topographically higher <br /> than the coal seam proposed for development and other potential <br /> hydrogeologic units in the Mesaverde Formation. The springs are <br /> most likely associated with surface quaternary deposits and/or <br /> local fault systems. <br /> There are no special floodplains, municipal watersheds or <br /> National Resources Waters located on the proposed lease tract. <br /> • J. Socioeconomic <br /> The proposed lease tract is located in both Delta and Gunnison <br /> Counties and most of the workers live in Delta County and the <br /> mine buys locally as much as possible. These local expenditures <br /> by the mine affect mainly Delta County. Delta County, thus, is <br /> the focus of the economic impact area analysis. <br /> Between 1980 and 1990, Delta County experienced changes in its <br /> population. The 1980 population was 21,225 and the 1985 <br /> population was 23, 466. The 1990 census puts the population at <br /> 20,980, a decrease of one percent over the 1980 population count. <br /> See Table 1 for the population of towns in Delta County. The <br /> Colorado Division of Local Government has made population <br /> projections for the period 1990-2015. Delta County is projected <br /> to have a population of 22 ,280 by 2015 or a .6.2 percent increase <br /> over 1990. <br /> Employment for Delta County increased from 7,600 in 1989 to 8,124 <br /> in 1990 or. a 7 percent increase according to data from the Bureau <br /> of - Economic Analysis. Mining employment was 345 in 1980 and <br /> dropped to 98 by 1989, a 72 percent decrease. In 1989 mining <br /> employment represented one percent of the county's employment. <br /> Mining earnings were 10.8 million in 1980 and decreased to 4.6 <br /> million- by 1989. Mining earnings represented 13 percent of non <br /> . farm earnings in 1980 and 4 percent of non farm earnings in 1989. <br /> Page 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.