My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1994-12-29_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1980007
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
1994-12-29_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1980007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/6/2021 10:59:04 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 11:13:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
12/29/1994
Doc Name
Decision Doc Federal Lease
Permit Index Doc Type
Other Permits
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
145
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
II. DESCRIPTION OF THE ALTERNATIVES INCLUDING THE PROPOSED ACTION <br /> • The proposed action is to offer for competitive lease 1011.64 acres of <br /> B Seam coal reserves in the Jumbo Mountain Tract as requested by <br /> Mountain Coal Company. There are two alternatives associated with <br /> this EA: Alternative One - the proposed action is to lease the Jumbo <br /> Mountain Tract and Alternative Two - No Action is to deny the lease <br /> application. The preferred alternative is to lease the tract. <br /> There are two possibilities under Alternative One. If Mountain Coal <br /> Company was the -successful bidder, the coal lease would be developed <br /> from the existing operation (West Elk Mine) . If another party was the <br /> successful bidder, two scenarios are possible. Either the lease would <br /> be developed by Mountain Coal Company or a new portal could be <br /> constructed. <br /> Because the coal seam outcrops on the tract, it is conceivable that a <br /> new operation with portal and surface facilities could be constructed <br /> on this tract. After reviewing the- geologic and engineering <br /> conditions, it was determined that there was little potential for <br /> creating a "stand-alone" tract. The Upper B seam splits to the south <br /> of the proposed lease tract and the splits have a higher ash content. <br /> Because there would be no potential for expanding the lease tract for <br /> additional coal reserves, it doesn't appear to be economically <br /> feasible to construct surface facilities for 10 million tons of <br /> reserves. Therefore, this EA does not consider the possibility of a <br /> "stand-alone" tract where new facilities would be constructed to <br /> develop and mine 10 million tons of coal. <br /> • A. Alternative One - Proposed Action <br /> The proposed action is to offer for competitive lease 1011.64 <br /> acres of federal coal, the Jumbo Mountain Tract, containing <br /> approximately 10 million tons of minable reserves. The coal <br /> reserves are in the B seam of the Mesaverde formation. Leasing <br /> the coal would prevent the bypass of federally owned coal. <br /> The tract lies to the west of a block of existing federal coal <br /> leases held by Mountain Coal Company; the existing leases are <br /> operated as the West Elk Mine. Production from the West Elk Mine <br /> was approximately 1.4 million tons in 1992, 716,060 tons in 1991 <br /> and averaged 560,000 tons between the years from 1989 to 1990. <br /> The B seam would be mined by underground longwall mining methods. <br /> Continuous miner units and shuttle cars would be used as the <br /> means of extraction, with a belt conveyor for transportation of <br /> the coal to the surface. Coal would be transported by conveyor <br /> from the portal to the rail loadout located on fee lands off <br /> Highway 133 east of Somerset. <br /> There is no anticipated surface disturbance on the tract. All <br /> mine facilities are located off the Jumbo Mountain Tract and are <br /> already permitted by CDMG on fee and federal lands. <br /> . Production is anticipated to commence on the tract by mid 1994 if <br /> Mountain Coal Company is the successful bidder. The production <br /> Page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.