Laserfiche WebLink
f III IIIIIIIII IIII III <br />STATE OF CGI~~I~9~~y <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />DrparlmBnl of Natural HcumrCrc I~~~~ <br />I} I 1 Sherman $L, Room ! I S <br />Drnvrr, Colorado Hfl'_Ui <br />I'honc: (1(111 N66 1567 <br />FA%. (lll.ll H.I'_'~H 1116 <br />1~)ETPAKTTTMTE7NT~O~F <br />1 V L~11 V rte[ ].L. <br />January 16, 1996 RESOURCES <br />Rny Romrr <br />Go.rrnoi <br />Ms. Kailileen Welt ,,,~,,., s. l„~hhcad <br />Mountain Coal Company Excr ulia• Dimarn <br />P.O. Box 591 n,~, 6acl e. ln~p <br />Somerset, CO 81434 °"""'°" °"""" <br />Re: Liability Insurance, West Elk Mine (Permit No. C-80-00'n <br />Dear Ms. Welt: <br />On January 2, 1996, we received the attached certificate. The certificate verifies that insurance <br />exists for Atlantic Richfield Company and all of its subsidiaries. The certificate does not verify <br />compliance with Rule 2.03.9 for the following reasons: <br />1. The certificate is too vague. Given the unknown number of entities covered, there is not <br />sufficient specificity [o ensure that [he West Elk Mine is individually insured to the required <br />limits. Competing claims could jeopardize the mine-specific coverage. <br />Ideally, the Mountain Coal Company, West Elk Mine would have its own policy. In the <br />absence of this option, the certificate should at least specify that the coverage applies to the <br />West Elk Mine, Permit No. C-80-007. <br />2. Please indicate how many (approximately) different entities are covered by this policy. <br />3. The cancellation clause must be amended to remove the wording "endeavor to" and "but <br />failure to mail such notice shall impose no obligation or liability of any kind upon the <br />company, its agents or representatives." <br />Please address this matter as soon as possible. Your assistance is appreciated. <br />A. Berry <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />DAB/bjw <br />Enclosure <br />\slw\wel.r.ona <br />