My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL56111
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL56111
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:41:02 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 11:08:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
5/14/1981
Doc Name
WESTERN FUELS REQUEST FOR INFORMAL CONFERENCE AND UNSUITABILITY PETITION
From
MLR
To
ARNOLD & PORTER
Permit Index Doc Type
PUBLIC CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL REST` "~s 11" I nm ~.,~~~~",~~ III III III III IIII III <br />OURCES~ ~ 999 <br />D. Monte Pascoe. E*ecutme Director <br />111N1':U LANI) I~H:I;LA111A771)IV <br />423 Centennial Building. 1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel (30~) 839-3567 <br />David C. Shelton <br />Director <br />May 19, 1981 <br />Mr. Narris Sherman <br />Arnold & Porter <br />Lincoln Center <br />1660 Lincoln Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80269 <br />Re: Western Fuels Request for Informal <br />Conference and Unsuitability Petition <br />Dear Mr. Sherman: <br />In your May 8, 1981 letter captioned as above you requested, in behalf of <br />the county commissioners of Rio Blanco County, the holding of an informal <br />conference (C.R.S. 1973, 34-33-118(6)). You enclosed with uour letter the <br />commissioners' petition to designate as unsuitable under 34-33-126 some <br />5595 acres of land. <br />Unfortunately, both the request for an informal conference and the petition <br />for designation as unsuitable were received after expiration of the time <br />specified in the governing act and therefore cannot be acted upon. The time <br />for filing the request and the petition expired thirty days after the last pub- <br />lication of the notice described in 34-33-118(2), on March 2, 1981. <br />You have suggested that the Division's tardy mailing to the county of the <br />notice required by 39-33-118(3) operated to extend the county's time to <br />request an informal conference. While we regret our tardiness in mailing <br />that notice, we have concluded that the delay was not prejudicial to your <br />client, which had ample actual notice of the Western Fuels application. <br />Additional proof of this was supplied in Attachment B to the county's unsuitabil- <br />ity petition, from which it appears that the comrrussioners were in direct contact <br />with the project operators long before the notice was required to have been <br />mailed. <br />The greatest portion of the 5595 acres consists, we believes of federal lands, <br />over which the Division has no unsuitability jurisdiction. 34-33-126(4). As <br />to the minor portion of the area which is privately owned, the applicant's mine <br />plan does not call for actual mining operations on such area. <br />The comments of the county commissioners on the Western Fuels application have <br />been considered most carefully. We appreciate receiving them. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.