My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL56092
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL56092
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:41:01 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 11:07:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1986076
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
8/11/1994
Doc Name
FINAL PERMIT COLO DISCHARGE PERMIT SYSTEM STORMWATER CERTIFICATION COR-040159 INACS MINE LA PLATA
From
CDOH
To
DGMC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
,• <br />COLORADO DEPAR7MENT OF HEALTH - Warcr Quality Conrro! Divsion <br />Rationale -Page 11 Pamir No. COR-0400p0 <br />!X PUBLIC NOTICE CHANGES <br />A public meeting wort held on August 5, 1992, err the Glerdale Community Ceruer, to rceeiue public mmmem on the <br />proposed draft general permit for rtormwater disdwrgu from moral mining operations. Approximately 40 people <br />attended In addition, S letters of mmmeru wcrc reoelved by the Division during the 60 day public comment period <br />A. Osrrlappinr Jurisdiction and the Role of the CDMG <br />The Division specifically asked jot public commem on what role the Colorado Division ojMinerals and Geology <br />(CDMG) ((orntcrly Mined Land Reclamation Division) of the Department of Natural Rvourcrs should play in elm <br />stormwater permiaing program. <br />Cammemers esprtssed concern over nc~ prospect of dual permitting since the CDMG hat an sitting rok in <br />regulating mining aaivilies. It was leer CDMG hat the appropriate 6adSgrourd and terhnical espatise to addriat <br />impkmemarion and rrgu-atian of stormwarer mmrol rcquironenu at mining operations." Commenters noted that <br />much if not aU ojthe injormatian required in a Stormwarn Managanem Plan rs already rcquind Jn CDMG <br />Reclamation Plans. Concern was also exprets that this dual permitting or permit review mold lead to <br />jurisdictional conflict and mnfwion, wasted time, and inctrarcd apense. <br />In response the Division wirhv ro clarify that section 402(pJ(2J(BJ of the Clean Water Act stipu/ata that <br />rrormwater discharges atsociated with industrial activity must 6e authorized 6y an NPDES petmlt. By jederol <br />regulation, mining operations arc included in the definition oj'irdumial activity' and therefore need ro meet the <br />requiremew of sections 301 and 402 of the Clean Water An. Compliance with other state rcquirtments does not <br />waive the requiranent to obtain an NPDES permit. <br />The Clean Water Act includes procedures jot delegating administration ojthe NPDES program from EPA to the <br />States jot control of pollutants discharged into their waters. Under the Clean Waur Au, lhcn an »o provisions <br />jot (hc Stale dekgaltd authority to junkier delegate the pnrnitting process w another agency. Delegation ojtltc <br />permitting auuhoriry to the CDMG would rcquin federal anion. <br />The Division agrees that in quire a few cater, srormwarer management controls are included in the reclamation <br />plan required by CDMG. the Division also agrees that CDMG has a good background and technical expertise err <br />well err a field inspection staff. The Division and the CDMG arc working on a Memorandum of Agreement (MOAJ <br />to ensure rhm the two agencies work together in permitting, inspection and enjornmem procvses, and to minimize <br />the duplication. The agencies iruerd to allow input from the regulated community regarding the conrem and <br />devrbpmeru of the MOA. <br />B. Coveraee for lnactivc Minin¢ Oocrarions <br />The Division spec~ca!!y asked for public mmmem on the dstinction between 'inactivr' and "historically inattisr' <br />mining operationt. Historically inactive mining operations were defined as mining sires that ceased operation prior <br />to July 1, 1973. 7hir is the effective dare ojrhe Colorado Open Mining Lard Reclamation Att. Inactive mining <br />operations wcrc defined as situ that ceased operation after July ], 1973. Coverage was cot provided for <br />historically inactive mining operations order the draft general permit. <br />Most commenters felt that coverage jot both types of inactive mines was inappropriate under this general perntit. <br />Some commemers jell ttrongly that the distinction based an the July I, 1973 date war inappropriate and did not <br />refktt the true srormwatn pollution potential. Most mmmeruers itdicnted that inactive mining operations should <br />have reduced pnntit obligations. <br />1n response, the Division has eliminated the distinction between inattivr and historically inactive mining <br />operatianr, and reduced the permit obligations jot all iwctivr mining opermiom. The Division wishes to c(anfy <br />that mines that have temporarily ceased mining and arc in 'temporary cessation' status with the CDMG, are <br />'active" miner jar the purpose ojrhis permit. The Division also wisher ra core that we reserve the right to require <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.