My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL55979
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL55979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:40:55 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 10:59:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977376
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
5/10/1995
Doc Name
REORGANIZED DEBTORS MOTION 05/08/95 FOR APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BY REORGANIZED DEBTORS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Benefit Act (the "Coal Act"), which was enacted October 24, <br />1992 as part of the Energy Policy Act. The Coal Act <br />established February 1, 1993 as the date the Combined Fund <br />and the 1992 Plan were to assume their full statutory duties. <br />2. The purpose of the Estimation Order was to <br />determine the priority, for <br />cases, to be given certain <br />Coal Act. In January 1993, <br />Estimation Order were being <br />parties, most provisions of <br />effective, and the Combined <br />yet fully operational. <br />purposes <br />potential <br />when the <br />consider <br />the Coal <br />Fund and <br />of CF&I's bankruptcy <br />claims arising under the <br />issues underlying the <br />ad by the Court and the <br />Act had not become <br />the 1992 Plan were not <br />3. Although the Coal Act was new, and the Combined <br />Fund and the 1992 Plan had yet to become fully operational, <br />the Bankruptcy Court was required to address and decide very <br />quickly the question of the priority to be accorded to the <br />potential Coal Act claims, in order to facilitate <br />implementation of CF&I's plan of reorganization that had been i <br />years in the making. The Court therefore had no choice but <br />to rule on the issues underlying the Estimation Order in an <br />expedited manner. Moreover, before they were fully <br />operational, the Combined Fund and the 1992 Plan had no <br />choice but to attempt to advocate their positions regarding <br />the appropriate priority for Coal Act claims under strict <br />time constraints. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.