My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL55958
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL55958
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:40:54 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 10:57:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
2/8/1993
Doc Name
Midterm Review Findings Document
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iiiiuiiuiiiiiiiii <br />STATE OF COLGI,~ ~~v <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />I7I3 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Phone: (303 S6Fs~3567 <br />FAX'. 13031 83 2-81 06 <br />February 8, 1993 <br />Mr. Allen S. Weaver <br />Energy Fuels Coal, Inc. <br />P.O. Box 449 <br />Florence, CO 81226 <br />Re: Hid-Term Review, Southfield Mine, C-81-014 <br />Dear Mr. Weaver, <br />OF'~ <br />~.~' - ~*~ <br />Fe% <br />• ret6 ~ <br />Roy Romer <br />Goverrgr <br />Michael B. Long <br />Division Director <br />Enclosed is the Division's Mid-Term Review and decision to require revisions <br />to the Southfield Mine Permit Application No. C-81-014. The review was in <br />fulfillment of Rules 2.08.3, 2.06.2(9), 2.06.3(4), 2.06.5(3) 2.06.7(5), and <br />3.02.2(4). <br />The mid-term review consisted of reviewing the permit application, stipulation <br />responses, revisions, any monitoring submittals, as well as information from <br />past field inspection reports. The main purpose of the review waa to identify <br />any areas of the permit application that will need to be revised or modified <br />to ensure compliance and reflect the current status of the mine. <br />The enclosed document contains our mid-term review: a rationale for requiring <br />any revisions to the application; a timetable for submitting responses; <br />adequacy questions; questions related to our performance bond evaluation; a <br />summary of the status of stipulations, and a chronology of the permitting <br />activity within the last five years. <br />The Division requests that EFCI submit appropriate responses to these concerns <br />by March 19, 1993. The responses should be submitted in a package using a <br />format that allows easy insertion of the responses directly into the original <br />permit application, and should include a proposed public notice for the <br />Technical Revision. <br />EFCI should expect the following review process: the Division will <br />subsequently make a decision on completeness of the submittal within ten days, <br />prepare an adequacy response within three weeks of the completeness letter, <br />anticipate receipt of responses to the adequacy letter within another three <br />weeks, and expect to make a decision by the sixtieth day per Rule <br />2.06.4(5)(b)(ii). Any outstanding issues will be assigned as stipulations <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.