My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL55954
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL55954
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:40:54 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 10:57:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
8/16/1996
From
MOUNTAIN COAL CO
To
LARRY & ELAINE MAUTZ
Permit Index Doc Type
PUBLIC CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C <br />• - 1• <br />You have repeatedly indicated that the dangers posed by the surface disturbances will force you <br />to forfeit the business profits you believe you will receive from some 59 hunting guests and 20 <br />cattle roundup guests. The cracks and 5ssures are highly localized and are found in an area <br />comprised of heavy scrub brush, historic landslide disturbances, and steep terrain. While the new <br />surface disturbances might add somewhat to the need for vigilance and care, they should not <br />prohibit or even significantly aggravate already treacherous off-road travel. As you know, we <br />have offered to help you by posting signs that would alert guests to the presence of the cracks and <br />recommend caution. In addition, you and your guides can also alert the guests to the conditions <br />and urge them to use caution. As a practical matter, these precautions should alleviate any <br />heightened danger posed by the surface disturbances. <br />In the event you conclude that the disturbed area is too dangerous for guests, you still have other <br />options short of forfeiting your business. The surface damage at issue affects a fraction of the <br />3,700 or more acres you own on Jumbo Mountain and adjacent areas. The disturbances are <br />located in an area of from 40 to 60 acres and are present on only a small portion of this 40 to 60 <br />saes area. Thus, if you feel the area poses a significant danger to your guests for off-road travel, <br />you have a vast amount of property they could visit this season without any diminished enjoyment <br />or success. <br />As repeatedly noted, MCC is ready and willing to repair the damage to the road on Jumbo <br />Mountain. Indeed, we had dispatched Chuck Chesnik to the area with a bulldozer on Monday <br />morning, August 5, to make the repairs when you directed us orally, and later in writing (by letter <br />dated August 5), not to touch the road. As a result, we had to intercept Mr. Chesnilc, azk him to <br />turn his bulldozer around, and the machine has sat idle ever since. In its present condition, the <br />road is practically unusable and I indicated in my letter to you of July 26 that caution should be <br />heeded in the area. Hence, rather than delaying the road work, we urge that you allow us to make <br />the repairs as soon as possible, while Mr. Chesnik and his bulldozer are available. <br />2. Damage to Cabin <br />In your letter of July 10, and again in our recent phone conversations, you indicated that you are <br />still concerned about the condition of your cabin. MCC acknowledges it has an obligation to <br />address damages to your cabin to the extent they are the result of mine-related subsidence. <br />Assuming that the damages were caused by subsidence, MCC is willing to either repair the <br />damage or compensate you for the diminution in value az required by both the Colorado <br />regulations and the Final Rule from OSM. I suggest that we arrange to conduct an inspection of <br />your cabin az soon az we can agree on a time and date to evaluate any remaining damage issues <br />and evaluate whether repair or compensation is appropriate. <br />~ In this connection, we need to address your suggestion during our phone rnnversation on August 8th that <br />someone might "deliberately" injure themselves on the property and your related assertion that you have "nothing <br />to lase." The implications of these statements are very troubling. 13e advised that MCC has no respo~uibiliry for <br />any injuries deliberately sustained or inflicted <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.