My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL55892
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL55892
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:40:51 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 10:53:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981013
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
2/23/1998
Doc Name
JIM AND ANN TATUMS CITIZENS COMPLAINT
Permit Index Doc Type
GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
...~....- .. ....- . ................... b..r .....~ ~.. uYv.• au au uJV •a a~. Jul 1G~.1: <br />.. ---- r..._._- -o. -' <br />land overlaying the mineral right to construct a ventilation shaft needed in the mineral <br />extraction operation, and that the mineral right owner must reasonably compensate the land <br />owner for any property taken, rendered unusable, or for surface disturbance resulting from <br />mining operations. Here, defendant's construction and use of the ventilation shafr resulted in <br />surface disturbance to plaintiffs' property. <br />5. The measure of damages ordinarily applied to situations where damage is caused to <br />real propcriy of another is the market value before and after the injury; i.e., the diminution of <br />value. <br />6. An appropriate remedy for breach of contract is to order the specific performance of <br />its terms and, if damages have resulted, to award actual damages. <br />7. Atrial court may award reasonable attorney fees if it determines that an action lacks <br />substantial justification. A claim Lacks substantial justification if it is "substantially frivolous, <br />substantially groundless, or substantially vexatious". <br />JUDGMENT AND ORDER <br />ACCORDINGLY, based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, <br />Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiffs, James Tatum and Ann Tatum, and against Basin <br />Resources, Inc., as follows: <br />1) Basin Resources, Inc. shall forthwith consult with, and cooperate with Plaintiffs, <br />James Tatum and Ann Tatum, to complete the orderly application and use of their exchange of <br />Maxwell Ditch water, including communication with appropriate state water officials of this . <br />judgment and order. <br />2) Judgment is entered in favor of James'Tatum and Ann Tatum, and against Basin <br />Resources,~Inc. as follows: <br />a. Compensatory damages for loss of water for four irrigating seasons in the <br />amount of THIRTY-TVJO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($32,000.00). <br />b. Compensatory damages for diminution of the value of their residence as a <br />result of subsidence damage, FORTY-EIGHT THOUSAND DOLLARS ($48,000.00). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.