Laserfiche WebLink
iii iiiiiiiiniiiiu <br />999 <br />The Corley Company <br />Pha ne 6326050 PO. BOx 1821 <br />COLORADO SPRINGS. COLORADO 60901 <br />Mar. 15, 1994 <br />Mr. Larry P. Routten <br />Division of Piinerals & Geology <br />1313 Sherman St. <br />Denver CO 80203 <br />ei. <br />rJ,^R 1 ~' 1994 <br />-, . <br />c, b~~y` <br />Ov <br />Dear Mr. Routten: <br />We have a few comments about your proposed addendum. Probably the major <br />problem is the concept that the addendum does not add or waive duties or <br />liabilities for either party resulting from the original agreement. If <br />we agree to the reduced construction and the alteration of plans, how <br />are we not releasing the Division from its original duties? We can see <br />that there are no added duties, but the addendum would certainly reduce <br />the Division's duties. The matter should be resolved prior to <br />construction, not afterwards. <br />Paragraph 7 still specifies the sum of $18,500, but some of that amount <br />has been spent. <br />Paragraph 7b states that contruction would be in accordance with the <br />design and specifications in the Field Directive of Bid Document <br />RN-GOAL-MINES-8, but we are unaware that there has been a redesign of <br />the diversion. Certainly, Mr. Berry's final design could not be <br />implemented for less than $18,500. Is there been an actual design you <br />are suggesting or is it a concept that you have discussed with Mr. <br />Kessler? <br />Finally, it is unclear what can be done now that the East Pit work has <br />eliminated the access road and blocked the diversion alignment. Have <br />the construction costs been increased by the new work? <br />Sincer ly, <br />~L~~- <br />W.D. Corley, Jr. <br />President <br />