My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL55749
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL55749
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:40:43 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 10:44:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1983141
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
9/18/1992
Doc Name
TR PERMIT M-83-141 COM INC
From
ROBERT HELMICK
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1~t~5 EEP 18, 199E IDt BOLJLPER CGUhIT'r TEL flat dal-3983 #~1~8 PAGE 8/4 <br /> <br /> <br />III'll'II'll"IIIII <br />September 18, 1992 <br />hlr. Uilliem York-feirn <br />hh ned Lard Reclama tten Office <br />Division of Iii Hera is and deol~yy <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />State of Lc lorado <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver CO 80302 <br />Re: Technical Revision - Perm-~t c n-83-i41 <br />BY FA%-ORIGINAL <br />Colt, inc. <br />BY MAIL <br />Dear FI r. York-Fetrn: <br />It has come to the attention of the Bculder County Land Use Department that the above <br />referenced application for technical re~iston tea pe emit has been apPlietl for and is due to be <br />acted upon by the dirisien in the near tutw~e. The county is concerned that despite precious <br />communican ons with the owners and operat ois of this mill, including an unappea led opinion of <br />the Zoning Admtntst rator, are now proposing to utilize the GoIU Ht ll hh ll to a manner contrary <br />[o uses allowetl to the Fc restrv distn ct. <br />Although I realize the li mtts of the Boards authority in this matter, a revision to allow the <br />processing of import ed ores would be in dtrert violation of county zoning. i would encourage <br />the board to uttU ze ~ehatever author Ty they ha~ie to not approve this portion of The proposed <br />revision. As you are aua re I parttcipa ted in the previous round of hearings on this matter and <br />at that time testif ted that the proposed importation of ores uou ld not be al lowed. <br />lam see wus ly concerned That the applicant slco-permitees have not contacted this office regarding <br />the current requested revision, etcher prior to submission or Uun ng the revi e•. period. Ihope [hat <br />this lack of commum tattoo regarding this matter is not an tnUtca[ton of future cooperation. <br />The Lantl Use stafif has expended a significant amount of time on enforcement on this site it is <br />our strong belief that approval of this permit revision will not be in the public interest. <br />Thank you for your attention to this matter, ifl may answer any questions or provtUe additional <br />tnf ormation please contact me here. <br />Sincerely, <br />Robert Hel mtck <br />Planning (tanager <br />opera n ona l /tom ng <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.