My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL55643
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL55643
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:40:38 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 10:39:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981033
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
2/8/1995
Doc Name
PROPOSED DECISION & FINDINGS OF COMPLIANCE FOR PR2
Permit Index Doc Type
FINDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
impacts within the permit boundary, and to prevent material damage to We <br />hydrologic bahmce outside the permit area. <br />IV. Topsoil <br />A. No topsoil was recovered from the historically disturbed areas of the Bear <br />No. 1, 2, and 3 Mines. Approximately 15 inches of topsoil was recovered from <br />the undisturbed parts of the Bear No. 3 Mine. The topsoil from the Bear No. 3 <br />facilities area is stored in a stockpile northeast of the mine office: Topsoil <br />placed on the reclaimed Bear No. 1 and 2 facilities auras was imported because <br />no topsoil was salvaged prior to mining. Topsoil was recovered from auras <br />which were disturbed by relocation of State Highway No. 133. <br />The reclamation plan for Bear No. 3 calls for ripping the facilities area to <br />alleviate compaction and reapplication of six inches of topsoil over most of the <br />facilities area. The topsoil replacement depth is less than the topsoil salvage <br />depth because topsoil is to be redistributed over a larger area than the area from <br />which it was salvaged. <br />V. Sealing of Drilled Holes and Underground Openings <br />A. Information describing sealing of the Bear No. 1 and 2 portals is presented in <br />Section 2.05.4 of the Bear No. 1 and 2 permit application. Sealing of the Bear <br />No. 3 portals is described in Section 1.05.4 of the Bear No. 3 permit revision <br />application. <br />The Bear No. 1 and 2 portals have been sealed and backfilled as part of Ure <br />approved reclamation plan. A double solid concrete block wall was constructed <br />in each portal. The portals have been backfilled to the surface. <br />The Division has expressed concern that the proposed portal sealing plan may <br />not adequately control mine water discharges (Adequacy Response, January 18, <br />1982). Bear Coal Company responded that no water had been encountered <br />during mining at the Bear No. 3 Mine and no water had historically discharged <br />from the abandoned Edwards Mine portals. The Division and Bear Coal <br />Company have agreed to reevaluate the portal sealing plan if any significant <br />amount of water is encountered during mining at the Bear No. 3 Mine. <br />)f mine inflows are encountered during mining operations, Bear Coal Company <br />has committed to submitting an appropriate sealing plan based on those <br />conditions to replace the standard sealing plan now contained in the application. <br />This approach is acceptable to the Division. <br />Per Stipulation 34 Bear Coal Company will be installing a water monitoring <br />well. The Division will require that this well will be capped, sealed, backfilled, <br />or otherwise properly managed in compliance with Rule 4.07.3. Details of <br />proper abandonment will be outlined in the response to Stipulation 34. <br />23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.